We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Are annuity returns quoted after lump sum taken out?

Sorry, this is probably a really basic question, but if an annuity is quoted as returning £6,500 per £100,000 is this after you have taken a 25% lump sum out or before?

So if I have £100k pension pot do I get £25k lump sum and £6,500 per year until I die or would I need pension pot of £133,333, then withdraw £33,333 as lump sum and get £6,500 per year on the remaining £100k.

Comments

  • ManAtHome
    ManAtHome Posts: 8,512 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    The anuity is based on the amount you pass over to the company, so is after you've taken the 25% (so you'd need a total fund of £133k ish to get the £6,500 in your example).

    Don't just accept the offer from your pension fund holder though - see an IFA and get them to shop around.
  • Thats brilliant thanks very much ManAtHome. Doesn't sound like a very good return to me. Thinking aboutg investing in property or corporate bonds. At least when you die your children will inherit something.

    I suppose the advantage of pensions is the tax relief as you put funds in, but after all the charges the administrators take out over the years that may well be eroded. I think I like the flexibility of being able to do what I want too rather than being forced to buy an annuity. Too many people making money out of you every step of the way.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,309 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Doesn't sound like a very good return to me.

    6500 on £100k is is 6.5%. can you find any product out there that guarantees 6.5% for life?
    Thinking aboutg investing in property or corporate bonds. At least when you die your children will inherit something.

    How does that differ to pensions if you include value protect guarantee?
    I suppose the advantage of pensions is the tax relief as you put funds in, but after all the charges the administrators take out over the years that may well be eroded.

    And how does that differ to running a property or holding other investments in other tax wrappers?
    I think I like the flexibility of being able to do what I want too rather than being forced to buy an annuity. Too many people making money out of you every step of the way.

    If you dont want an annuity then dont buy an annuity.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • How good 6.5% for life is depends on how long your life lasts! My dad died at 69 and so I'm not expecting to live long into my 70s.

    I appreciate your reply Dunstonh as I still have much to learn about pensions planning. I'd never heard of "value protect guarantee". I thought that after you'd purchased an annuity and outlived the guarantee period, then once you died your estate would receive nothing.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,309 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    How good 6.5% for life is depends on how long your life lasts! My dad died at 69 and so I'm not expecting to live long into my 70s.

    In your case then it makes sense to consider guarantees.
    I'd never heard of "value protect guarantee". I thought that after you'd purchased an annuity and outlived the guarantee period, then once you died your estate would receive nothing.

    Not every provider offers it. Certainly not the ones you would normally have the pension product with.

    Hopefully, the Conservatives will follow through with their pledge to remove annuity compulsion on pensions. That will make pensions so much more attractive.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • In what way would you invest in property?

    There's only one way property is going, and that's down - barclay's themselves did a presentation recently showing how property was the biggest bubble yet to fully pop. Repossessions are through the roof and nobody can realistically afford today's insane prices. If rates rise, people will be in big trouble - yes, I do also check out housepricecrash, and no - and not a maniac! But I would be very careful regards property which I believe will tank massively. It's common sense!
  • Sorry, we're invested in property already. We have a choice of selling a house that we rent out at the moment or spending some money and increasing the rental income. Selling would cost £11,000 plus and then there would likely be upfront charges if we invested in some kind of fund(s) so we're thinking of improving the house and keeping longer term and treating as our "pension".

    To be honest, we were worried about what to do with any funds if we did sell the house. There is so much uncertainty at the moment. Would you keep it in Sterling or move to a safer currency? Shares v bonds, etc.

    We lost a fair bit with Lloyds and RBS over the last couple of years so really don't trust equities. I know shares have recovered reasonably well, but feel very let down by the investment community.

    I think long term property is still a good investment so thinking keeping the house is the "least worst" investment decision :-)
  • EdInvestor
    EdInvestor Posts: 15,749 Forumite
    There is no annuity compulsion any longer.What needs to be removed is onerous tax levies on people who die over aged 75.

    Up to that age, the remains of a pension pot which has been held in income drawdown can be left to heirs as a lump sum with a 35% tax charge deducted (basically you are paying back the tax relief the Govt gave you,which you would do anyway if you took the money as income, fair enough).

    But after 75, this leaps to 82%.It is still better than an annuity where you pay 100%, but that's all you can say.This is what needs to be changed.

    The 35% tax deduction should be extended until death at any age.
    Trying to keep it simple...;)
  • jamesd
    jamesd Posts: 26,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    35% isn't high enough to discourage higher rate tax payers from using it for tax planning and inheritance planning. Somewhere between there and 82% or perhaps with a cap on an amount getting a lower rate would do the job and be less open to use for purposes other than primarily providing retirement income for a living person for the rest of their life.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.