PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Exchanged but can't complete - serious mess

Options
We've exchanged contracts and are due to complete tomorrow. There is a notice on the property, placed by the person we are buying from ex partner. We've just heard that the ex isn't going to remove the notice, he wants £35,000. It would have to go to court to get the notice removed.

Our solicitor failed to find the notice until after exchange, the person we are buying from has just pointed out the clause in the HIP. The exchange was very rushed, due to pressure from the person we are buying from.

The person we are buying from has now told us that if we can't complete tomorrow, we will lose the deposit, plus forfeit 10% of the sale, so around £40,000. We are unable to buy as the property has a notice.

Don't know where we stand, as we've signed a contract. The solicitors who we are buying from did know of the notice. But the property cannot be legally purchased, as the land registry can not transfer ownership.

Help!
«13456

Comments

  • pimento
    pimento Posts: 6,243 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    I think the person you're buying from is wrong. If they own the property and the ex has an interest in it, that's their problem not yours. If the vendor's bank had an interest in the property, they couldn't sell it to you, so there's no difference really if it's the vendor's ex. Is his name also on the mortgage?

    Mind you, your solicitor has been a bit remiss in all this. What does s/he have to say?
    "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." -- Red Adair
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Sounds very interesting. All this is being communicated through the sellers and the not the solicitors handling the transaction?
  • Comyface
    Comyface Posts: 669 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    Oh dear, that is a bit of a mess.

    Your sols shouldn't have let you exchange IMO and so therefore they should be liable to cover your losses.

    I'm not an expert, though, just my tuppence.
    Hope it all works out okay. :)
    Are the words 'I have a cunning plan' marching with ill-deserved confidence in the direction of this conversation? :cool:
  • If the facts are correct (as I understand them), then it may be your solicitor is in very deep trouble.....

    Before you exchanged contracts I take it they did a search and nothing was revealed? and now that you have almost completed he has done the final search and discovered the notice? When did the notice get lodged with the Land Registry? Was the ex obviously in occupation on your inspection? Does your contact (No's 4) say the property is sold with vacant possession?

    Rereading your post, was the notice on the register BEFORE you exchanged contracts?

    Clause in the HIP? Is that binding? Or rather is the contract you both signed the definitive document (Ps. It's the contract!). What does the HIP say?

    Have you actually spoken with the solicitor yet? You need to see what they are saying.
  • The ex isn't on the mortgage and never has been. Apparently a previous court case was rejected and he is not entitled to any share. Why is someone that lived at a property but was never on the mortgage allowed to put in an application for a notice?
  • Your solicitor should have spotted this and received an undertaking from your vendors solicitor that the notice would be removed on completion.

    As it stands you can complete by paying the correct amount as agreed in the contract tomorrow, it would then be the vendor in breach of contract as they will be unable to complete because they cannot remove the notice.

    I would be having a very serious conversation with a senior partner at your solicitors office tomorrow if I were you, they need to sort it out and pronto.


    CC debt at 8/7/13 - £12,186.17
    Barclaycard £11,027.58
    Halifax £1,158.59
    5 year plan to live unsecured debt free and move home
  • What does the notice actually say?
  • caeler
    caeler Posts: 2,637 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Mortgage-free Glee! Photogenic
    Hi - Do you know if this notice is for Matrimonial Home Rights? This is where the spouse who isn't on the deeds or mortgage registers their interest in the property because its their former matrimonial home, it prevents selling, transferring ownership and remortgaging. Usually this is lifted when a financial settlement is agreed, so I assume this is what hasn't happened yet.
  • The solicitors work on information from the HIP, which is not a legally binding document and out of date? Our solicitors are saying the notice was not on the documents that they received but there is a line on the HIP with reference to applications on the title. A priority search would have found this problem earlier?

    I've left messages with the solicitor but they are not working until tomorrow am. Our broker has phoned our solicitors mobile and left messages also. The buyers solicitors are advising the buyers that if we don't complete they are entitled to the deposit and 10% of the purchase price. Surely they knew we would be unable to complete on a property that had a notice.

    The seller's ex has advised in the eleventh hour that he won't remove the notice.

    I'm not going to sleep much tonight.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Hi - Do you know if this notice is for Matrimonial Home Rights? This is where the spouse who isn't on the deeds or mortgage registers their interest in the property because its their former matrimonial home, it prevents selling, transferring ownership and remortgaging. Usually this is lifted when a financial settlement is agreed, so I assume this is what hasn't happened yet.

    I thought it interesting that the seller is quoting £40k for losses when his ex is claiming £35k. Too co-incidental.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.