We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Interest only mortgages

13»

Comments

  • Nukumai
    Nukumai Posts: 278 Forumite
    edited 25 January 2010 at 10:30AM
    VIGILANT22 wrote: »
    It would appear this is a residential mortgage and not BTL, hence the repayment......

    You are probably correct. But, assuming that the rental income is declarable, interest-only still remains the rational option (whether you choose to call the mortgage "BTL" or "residential").
  • Nukumai
    Nukumai Posts: 278 Forumite
    As an aside,surely an interest only mortgage would be ideal for say,someone who is single and has no family to speak of,to whom they would want to leave a property?

    Not necessarily. If you believe that you can generate better returns than the repayment-mortgage rate (using the monthly "saved" capital component) then that makes perfect sense.

    Similarly, if you believe in future inflation then, again, an interest-only mortgage is perfectly rational.

    Horses for courses....
  • VIGILANT22
    VIGILANT22 Posts: 2,516 Forumite
    Nukumai wrote: »
    You are probably correct. But, assuming that the rental income is declarable, interest-only still remains the rational option (whether you choose to call the mortgage "BTL" or "residential").


    :)....Declared!!??... going by the reluctance and defensive reply Hmm!!
    ..also it isn't always the case IO is the best option, depends on client's risk profile, portfolio, exit plans, CGT liability etc...........
  • Nukumai
    Nukumai Posts: 278 Forumite
    VIGILANT22 wrote: »
    :)....Declared!!??... going by the reluctance and defensive reply Hmm!!

    Kinda what I was thinking; hence my use of the term "assuming".
    ..also it isn't always the case IO is the best option, depends on client's risk profile, portfolio, exit plans, CGT liability etc...........

    Correct. But, in the absence of irregular circumstances, IO nonetheless remains the more tax efficient arrangement.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.