Britons to be asked for NI number, date of birth and signature to get right to vote

drc

The future of voting :eek:

From the Telegraph;

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/6952227/Revealed-Britons-to-be-asked-for-NI-number-date-of-birth-and-signature-to-get-right-to-vote.html

The information will be added to local electoral registers and held at city halls across the country, raising concerns about the security of the data. The Government also admitted that the new plans could discourage people from voting.
Last night campaigners sounded the alarm about the plans, which are to be introduced after July, suggesting that the breadth of information which will be held by councils will present “the perfect kit for identity fraud”.
Electoral administrators said they were concerned that the extra information could be made available to people who purchase copies of the electoral register.

The new requirement for people to provide additional “personal identifiers” when they register to vote has been brought in by the Government to cut down on voter fraud at local and general elections.
Currently returning officers only require an adult at an address to certify that the people living in the household are over 18 and can vote.
However, after July electoral registration officers will be able to ask all householders to hand over three “personal identifiers “ - their signatures, dates of birth and NI numbers - as part of a new "individual elector registration" (IER) scheme, along with names and addresses.
There are fears that this could be expanded to include identity cards and even people’s finger-prints because of a special allowance in the legislation used to bring in the change.
The new way of registering to vote could be compulsory within five years. A briefing note from the Electoral Commission says: “IER is expected to replace the current practices of household and rolling registration by July 2015”.
There are already concerns about the plans. The Association of Electoral Administrators suggested that some of the extra information could be sold to anyone who buys copies of the electoral register.
John Turner, the association’s chief executive, said: “People should have concerns if their personal data is made available for anyone with a big enough cheque. The more personal data on the register, the more sensitive they will become.”
Campaigners questioned whether it was worth the risks of storing this extra personal information to deal with what they said was the relative small problem of electoral fraud.
Alex Deane, a spokesman from civil liberties group Big Brother Watch, said: “We have managed to have elections in this country without surrendering this sort of information for hundreds of years.
“Creating databases of our signatures, NI numbers and dates of birth has obvious risks for our privacy and identity security. The sole problem identified by the Government is election fraud.
"This is a very small issue in this country, and is driven mostly by postal voting. If you have to go on database to vote some people might say 'forget it then'.”
David Howarth MP, the Liberal Democrat’s justice spokesman, added: “This is yet more personal data being handed over to officials.
“Local authorities must remember the important data protection principle that information must never be used for another purpose, only to register to vote.
“Of most concern is the potential for the Government to move the goalposts and change the identifier required. National insurance numbers must not be allowed to become ID cards.”
The Government is already aware of potential controversy about the new plans and is planning a series of seminars to discuss any concerns in the next few months.
The Ministry of Justice said admitted that it was aware there was a risk that fewer people might register to vote because of the onerous requirements to hand over more personal data.
A spokesman said: "Individual Electoral Registration introduces significant changes to the current system of household registration and it can not be rushed because if we get it wrong then that could impact negatively on registration rates.
"We are not prepared to take such a risk with the bedrock of our democracy. We intend to hold an event in the near future to provide a forum for an open debate on issues surrounding databases and security.
“This event will take place before there is a move to collect the personal identifiers for IER and give us an opportunity for any relevant issues to be addressed.”
A spokesman for the Electoral Commision said: "The right to register to vote is of fundamental importance in our democracy and is something for which individuals should take personal responsibility.
"A move towards individual voter registration will lead to a more accurate and secure electoral register. This is a major change, requiring detailed planning, and can't be done overnight.
“We’ll be reporting annually to Parliament from 2011 on what progress is being made and whether it remains on course for delivery in 2015."

baby_boomer

I totally agree with this as the current system would be condemned internationally if we were Zimbabwe.

No surprise, though, that Nu Labour wants to keep the old system for its last hurragh in May/June since Labour is the chief beneficiary of electoral fraud.

It will be interesting to see the other effects, though.

There are about 10m extra NI numbers in circulation than there are people !

The recent advent of postal voting has led to an avalanche of corruption and also takes away women's rights in many homes.

Does anyone here actually doubt that true democracy depends on citizens properly identifying themselves?

wymondham

possibly another reason for not voting??? In these times we are always told not to hand over these types of information.. very odd.

lostinrates

I'd have no problem with proving id. It would seem a good idea to prove address and id. I'm always surprised how easy it is, and I vote for myself and last time for DH too. Its harder to prove who you are to hire a dvd.

lemonjelly

Not exactly sure how this relates to houses & the economy? Unless you're just trying to provoke a reaction?

mr_fishbulb

lemonjelly wrote: »

Not exactly sure how this relates to houses & the economy? Unless you're just trying to provoke a reaction?

I thought that was the criteria for all threads in this forum?