We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Help with RuthBridge Ltd
Comments
-
Morning all
So today we received the paperwork from Ruthbridge. They sent out the credit agreement which looks ok and a payment history.
The last payment was in June 2004 (made by my partners sister) after a DC turned up at the door. My partners last payment made was Dec 2003.
So in theory she is up the creek without a paddle thanks to her sister paying in June 2004.
Can she ignore them until June 2010 at which time it will be 6 years since last payment or will they be able to make her bankrupt before then?
She has no assets i.e house ,car etc.
Whats your advice good people of MSE?0 -
Surely by discussing your GF debt and accepting payment from her sister they are in breach of the Data Protection Act.0
-
Don't know TBH but as far as i am aware the payment was collected at the door so being able to prove who actually made the payment would be impossible in my honest opinion.0
-
Any ideas anyone?0
-
thatchamlad wrote: »Morning all
So today we received the paperwork from Ruthbridge. They sent out the credit agreement which looks ok and a payment history.
The last payment was in June 2004 (made by my partners sister) after a DC turned up at the door. My partners last payment made was Dec 2003.
So in theory she is up the creek without a paddle thanks to her sister paying in June 2004.?
Not sure on the legal situation regarding the payment by her sister, what a b**ggir.
Are you absolutely sure the CCA is OK?thatchamlad wrote: »Can she ignore them until June 2010 at which time it will be 6 years since last payment or will they be able to make her bankrupt before then?
She has no assets i.e house ,car etc.
Whats your advice good people of MSE?
Ok if she has not assets,there is little point in Ruthless paying £1500 for the joy of finding out that they can get nothing from her.
Do you have the default letter in the package?
If so, scan that and get ready to post it up for 10past6. he is away this weekend so come back on Monday.If you've have not made a mistake, you've made nothing0 -
No there is no default letter in the paperwork.
The cca looks fine, has all the terms and is signed etc
She has absolutely no assets0 -
Ok, you do not want to get in a situation in which she accidently acknowledges the debt at this stage, but Ruthless will have done a check to see if she has any assets and I very much doubt if they have any real intention of making her bankrupt. They might try an SD in an attempt to panic her into making some sort of payment within the 6 year deadline.
You need to get a SAR done to find that default letter. If that is faulty she can halt any legal action. Chances are it will be. Got to go.If you've have not made a mistake, you've made nothing0 -
Ok, you do not want to get in a situation in which she accidently acknowledges the debt at this stage, but Ruthless will have done a check to see if she has any assets and I very much doubt if they have any real intention of making her bankrupt. They might try an SD in an attempt to panic her into making some sort of payment within the 6 year deadline.
You need to get a SAR done to find that default letter. If that is faulty she can halt any legal action. Chances are it will be. Got to go.
So the SAR letter on the template page is the best course of action now?0 -
I would argue the fact that it was not the account holder that made the payment, as it doesn't stop a DCA going to the wrong house, or even making a payment on the account themselves.Although no trees were harmed during the creation of this post, a large number of electrons were greatly inconvenienced.
There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies0 -
.
Are you absolutely sure the CCA is OK?
.
Can someone check the attached CCA and tell me if it is enforcable?
Many thanks
http://i958.photobucket.com/albums/ae61/londonloyalist/Untitled-1.jpg0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards