London house prices already exceed 'peak' of 2007

Jonbvn

nembot wrote: »

If I had property allegedly worth 600k and earned 100k+ per annum, I wouldn't be on a hidden forum......

I just realised this applies to me. Strangely enough we have a life far from the conspicuous consumption you may imagine. We earn more than these muppets and do not spend anywhere close to their budget. By comparison with my peers from university, I would say we are about par. Please explain why this makes me ineligible for this forum?

nollag2006

IveSeenTheLight wrote: »

What did he not back up?
He posted a graph.
Posted the LR link.
Posted a guide on how to search for LR methadology.

It's all there available for you

Poor old abaxus isn't all that bright.

This is the poster who started a thread with the title "Coupe da tar.." some time ago

:rotfl:

No matter how much you try to explain to most bears that the house price crash is over, they still won't get it.


:rolleyes:

IveSeenTheLight

abaxas wrote: »

If you cant backup an argument you dont have one. It's not my job to prove his point, it's his.

It would appear all the information is available for you and there is little more that can be done to help you.

Chucky, is the a lmgtfy widget that reads out the text?
Just in case he wants you to read it out for him

try this one http://www.textreader.net/

abaxas

It's great to see the Bulls having the debating skills of a mute. *

* no offence meant to people who cant speak.

nollag2006

abaxas wrote: »

It's great to see the Bulls having the debating skills of a mute.

They have substanteallee butter spulling skills than yew

:rotfl:

IveSeenTheLight

abaxas wrote: »

It's great to see the Bulls having the debating skills of a mute. *

* no offence meant to people who cant speak.

You have been shown how to obtain the LR methodology.
Can you please advise any issues you have with it?
It may be interesting.

abaxas

nollag2006 wrote: »

They have substanteallee butter spulling skills than yew

:rotfl:

Here is a picture of a hamster.

By rules of 'Chucky' I dont have to explain what it means.

Please google the answer.

IveSeenTheLight

abaxas wrote: »

It's great to see the Bulls having the debating skills of a mute. *

* no offence meant to people who cant speak.

You have been shown how to obtain the LR methodology.
Can you please advise any issues you have with it?
It may be interesting.

abaxas wrote: »

Here is a picture of a hamster.

By rules of 'Chucky' I dont have to explain what it means.

Please google the answer.

Maybe not then.

chucky

IveSeenTheLight wrote: »

You have been shown how to obtain the LR methodology.
Can you please advise any issues you have with it?
It may be interesting.

the issues were that house prices were rising.... it's always amuses me to see the bearish posters unable to prove otherwise and try to take discussions on different tangents...

abaxas

nollag2006 wrote: »

They have substanteallee butter spulling skills than yew

:rotfl:

chucky wrote: »

the issues were that house prices were rising.... it's always amuses me to see the bearish posters unable to prove otherwise and try to take discussions on different tangents...

So far I've found this.

1) it's based on resale from 1995 onwards. Ie if a home is sold that was bought beofer 1995, it isnt included.
2) all reposessions are excluded.
3) commercial property of property bought by a company is not included.
4) all new builds or conversions are excluded.

Anything else we can add?

* cba to spell check.