We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Departure
kirky666
Posts: 14 Forumite
I've just had a reassessment and am still under the old formula. The calculated amount under the old formula is higher than it would be under the new formula. A departure was then added making it higher still. I was maybe going to query the departure on the basis that my payment was already higher than the new formula even without the departure. Anyone have any idea how this will be viewed by CSA?
0
Comments
-
A no go i am afraid. What was the departure awarded for ?0
-
Do you have any children that live in your household just now0
-
If a departure is in place that awards a percentage of costs to the NRPP its difficult to have this decision overturned. We have succeeded in getting the percentage amount reduced in some cases where housing costs have been restricted initially - but on the whole, if the NRPP is working - the departure is going to succeed and maintenance is going to increase.
But as you are an existing client - any review will continue to take place under the old rules system (you would need to be involved with a linked case in order to move to the new system). CSA staff cannot amend your payments on the grounds that you would pay differently under the new system. The calculation is governed by legislation - so legally, the amount calculated is the amount due.0 -
Do you have any children that live in your household just now
No there's just me and my partner.
Thanks guys for the replies. I thought that might be the case, but I also thought there was some element of discretion with regard to departures and they might have taken the old/new formula variance into account.0 -
there is no old/new variance to take into account - you are either old or new cases I'm afraid. The discretion is based on evidence - if your partner failed to give her income details, then the CSA have the discretion to use whatever figure they feel they want to apply - they normally default to 50/50 but there have been cases where 99% has been allocated to the partner.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards