We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Redundant but the job still exists?
Chuzzle
Posts: 625 Forumite
How long after making someone redundant can you fill their position with another employee already employed by you? Do you have to offer it to the rendundant person first?
Banana Lovers
Buy your bananas in bunches of 5 on Sunday. Then arrange them in order of ripeness and write a day of the week on each banana in felt pen, Monday on the ripest, Friday on the greenest to save time making those decisions on a hectic weekday morning
0
Comments
-
I thought that redundancy was only offered if the job itself ceased to exist?
Why would they make someone redundant and then offer them the same job back?
0 -
because they wanted to get rid off the incumbent without going through due dismissal/disciplinary process.
what is being suggested is trying to flout the rules. I am not an employment specialist but OP should expect to get some harsh posts from those who areI think I saw you in an ice cream parlour
Drinking milk shakes, cold and long
Smiling and waving and looking so fine0 -
It is not actually the person who is redundant, it is the job. The person becomes redundant as a result. You cannot then employ another person to do the same job. If you do this, I think you are paving the way for being taken to an employment tribunal. The OP is on very shaky ground.0
-
Its not me that is doing this, but the company I work for has done this earlier this year and is now expecting another member of staff to replace the redundant person permenantly. I think they did it just to get rid of the employee cos the job the do definitely has not ceased to be.Banana LoversBuy your bananas in bunches of 5 on Sunday. Then arrange them in order of ripeness and write a day of the week on each banana in felt pen, Monday on the ripest, Friday on the greenest to save time making those decisions on a hectic weekday morning0
-
Redundancy can also mean that the job has shrunk to the degree that the duties are better being re-allocated. Or that there is a decrease in work so 1 (or positions) are in for the chop meaning losing 2 in 4 Waitresses, for example meaing that the job "Waitress" still exists, but the workload has decreased.
If the job is merely being absorbed into another role, then it's reallocation of duties, and very common.
A savvy employer would avoid advertising an identical role, however technically there is no minimum time scale for readvertising the post, although it is often suggested that 6 months would be considered reasonable by a Tribunal."On behalf of teachers, I'd like to dedicate this award to Michael Gove and I mean dedicate in the Anglo Saxon sense which means insert roughly into the anus of." My hero, Mr Steer.0 -
I have just been made redundant and asked the question to Citizens Advice, the answer for my position as an environmental engineer is that the employer told me that we had no work for me and that the employer and employee could not agree on a 6 month sabbatical, therefore the route was redundancy.
At that moment in time there was not enough work to employ me, but the company can recruit tomorrow if new work was to be won or awarded. There are no rules that I was made aware of.
The job title (position) for that moment in time could not be sustained. The company can recruit at any time the workload picks up.
I am not happy about the action, but my fingers were tied that I was selected to be given the boot after 9 years loyality! and got the basic redundancy payment
although I did a good job when there was work, so never burn bridges, I might be back when (if) it picks up for the company.
There is much talk about a length of time before recruiting again, and offer to the person they let go off... but thats all hear say, the company is within the law to recruit again at any time and can recruit previous staff or new staff.0 -
One important point in the OP's first post is that this is an internal move and not a new recruit to the company.
In any redundancy, people can be "bumped" round.
That applies even if the actual requirement for the job has not changed: the original incumbent is dismissed on the grounds of redundancy but another employee takes on the post.0 -
I worked for a financial services company who does that all the time. The owner is a meglomaniac, misogynistic, alcoholic who thinks nothing of rotating his sales team, admin support and PA by this method. Even if it were brought to tribunal he makes sure they haven't been there long enough for it to be worthwhile chasing. Good luck0
-
A company can make someone redundant and then at some future point re-create the position in certain circumstances (like loosing and then getting another contract) there is no set time limit to this.
If you believe that your redundancy was unfair for any reason, you have up to 3 months from the end of your employment to challenge the decision in an employment tribunal.
Vader0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178K Life & Family
- 260.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards