We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Pensions Planning: The NUMBER

1287288290292293295

Comments

  • Smudgeismydog
    Smudgeismydog Posts: 640 Ambassador
    500 Posts Third Anniversary Photogenic Mortgage-free Glee!
    Great update, sounds like you are in a very healthy position, and living a very full retirement
    Good for you 
    I’m a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on the Pension, Debt Free Wanabee, and Over 50 Money Saving boards. If you need any help on these boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the Report button, or by e-mailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.
  • LL_USS
    LL_USS Posts: 426 Forumite
    100 Posts Second Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    @MarriedWithKids89 now there's hope for those of us who want to see if we can live on low to moderate retirement funding  :)
    I suppose this is not living in those bigger and more expensive cities.... 
    I will stay in my current city and won't try to move to near the kids if living costs are high still during my retirement...
  • ex-pat_scot
    ex-pat_scot Posts: 727 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    LL_USS said:
    @MarriedWithKids89 now there's hope for those of us who want to see if we can live on low to moderate retirement funding  :)
    I suppose this is not living in those bigger and more expensive cities.... 
    I will stay in my current city and won't try to move to near the kids if living costs are high still during my retirement...
    I make that getting on for £45,000 net. 
    (or £32,000 plus NZ).

    That's moderate-to-generous, in my book, rather than low-to-moderate! £3,750/m. No rent/mortgage.

    Cars, and holidays, and grandchildren, can indeed be a really punchy cost for many.

    I've no real idea of actuals, as we are not yet near a steady state of spending post-work and post-children. We have lots, and they are some way from being off the payroll.
    I'm expecting that the base running costs will be £2000 to £2250 / month for us.

    This will be the utilities, insurances, oil & elec, maintenance, car running costs, food.
    Anything above that starts to become discretionary - gifts, clothes, capex (inc car), holidays etc.

    I have a vague "£5,000 per month ought to be nicely comfortable" notion, recognising that this is not going to be linear throughout retirement, and will need a bit of jiggery-pokery with SIPP juggling before State Pensions kick in.

    I'm not keen to play the game of follow-the-children, as the transaction costs are high, and would likely be to SE commuter belt / London which would require additional capital.
    Any cities feel really expensive these days, compared to our rural N Yorks idyll. Stuff like parking, endless coffee shops, shopping-as-a-leisure-pursuit. 


  • LL_USS said:
    @MarriedWithKids89 now there's hope for those of us who want to see if we can live on low to moderate retirement funding  :)
    I suppose this is not living in those bigger and more expensive cities.... 
    I will stay in my current city and won't try to move to near the kids if living costs are high still during my retirement...
    We're about an hour outside of London but in a relatively cheap area given the locale. Of course, everyone's retirement looks (and costs) different, and one needs to plan accordingly. For what it's worth, when we originally retired we budgeted £12K per annum on discretionary spending (e.g. holidays, short breaks, days out, meals, takeaways, luxuries, etc.) but we actually struggled to spend it all ... at first ;o)
  • LL_USS
    LL_USS Posts: 426 Forumite
    100 Posts Second Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    We're about an hour outside of London but in a relatively cheap area given the locale. Of course, everyone's retirement looks (and costs) different, and one needs to plan accordingly. For what it's worth, when we originally retired we budgeted £12K per annum on discretionary spending (e.g. holidays, short breaks, days out, meals, takeaways, luxuries, etc.) but we actually struggled to spend it all ... at first ;o)

    Thank you. I am trying to work out the minimum I would need (i.e. just like your subsistence part) - then plan to work till my Defined Benefit can cover that (if I retire earlier than that then whether enough saving to bridge till taking out the DB). 
    I have calculated to see that I can (just) survive with about 14,000 net a year (in today's money) in a relatively lower-cost of living city. If we still have state pension when I turn 68 then it'll be a bonus. 
    This is just to plan how long I should definitely work until, if I want to help the kids. 
  • @LL_USS I suspect we could easily cut our subsistence spending by £2K-£3K so £14K per annum seems highly do-able to me. Just don't forget about irregular (but usually expensive spending) like household/vehicle repairs and replacing furniture and electrical goods. These expenses might only occur infrequently but could cost £K's when they do.

  • LL_USS
    LL_USS Posts: 426 Forumite
    100 Posts Second Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper

    Thank you @MarriedWithKids89 - that's true.
    I plan to always maintain about 70K on ISA for irregulars already so my no-frills minimum number may be okay then. I will still be careful keeping enough saving to have a bit more comfort.

  • WillC999
    WillC999 Posts: 30 Forumite
    Second Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper

    Interested in the discussion re. fiscal drag (freezing tax bands) and how best to get money out in retirement. My current thinking is start DB at 56 (about 12k, covers essentials, a sort of annuity feel…) and top up with SIPP (front loaded) until SP starts at 68. Aim is to empty SIPP (spend, to ISA) under the 50k band.

    A second option is to put off the DB until 65 (about 18k) and use just the SIPP to bridge to SP at 68.

    I prefer the first option, for the annuity feel of the DB and seeing SIPP as a 'fun fund'. I dislike the second option as although the amount of eventual fixed income is higher (about 30k), it comes later.

    I'm trying to work out if either is better, in terms of risk, financials, or avoiding hitting the 50k threshold (which as someone pointed out is effectively decreasing each year with fiscal drag).

    Anyone got any words of wisdom to impart?

    Cheers

  • NoMore
    NoMore Posts: 1,945 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper

    Probably best starting your own thread, as this thread isn't specifically about withdrawal strategies and tax planning but merely the number you believe you need in retirement.

    Plus despite their intention pinned threads seem to get less traffic over time than fresh threads.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.7K Life & Family
  • 262.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.