📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Pensions Planning: The NUMBER

Options
1247248250252253287

Comments

  • Madrick
    Madrick Posts: 118 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Updating my spreadsheet 

    I am single, now living alone as brood have left the nest
     almost 63 with own home (sadly not own teeth)
    Still working at home full time on an average wage circa £35k
    Pay 25% into workplace pension through salary sacrifice 


    Have a pension pot circa £250k
    ISA and savings circa £60k

    Have pension from Royal Mail of £2,400 pa less tax

    When I do retire, I intend to pay £2880 annually into a pension to withdraw the £3.6k

    ***********************
    On my spreadsheet 

    I have used a very modest growth of 1.5% to my own pension pot 

    I have factored in a 2.5% annual increase to the State Pension (when I eventually get it) 

    I have factored in a 2.5% annual increase to my little Royal Mail pension, (although this year I believe is going to be 6.7%)

    I have then factored in a 3% annual increase to the £20k after tax pa required amount to live on, to allow for inflation
    (Topped up with cash from the ISA if necessary until the State Pension kicks in) 

    With those numbers, it should last 22 years

    If I increase the pension Pot growth to 2.5% it will out live me.... 

    Do those percentages seem OK for those that are financial gurus? 

    Would you say that with my current pension pot, ISA cash and modest needs, I have enough to take the plunge? 
     
  • SouthCoastBoy
    SouthCoastBoy Posts: 1,084 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper
    You don't appear to have mentioned inflation? Are the growth figures in excess of inflation? Has your required number taken inflation into account?
    It's just my opinion and not advice.
  • Madrick
    Madrick Posts: 118 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    You don't appear to have mentioned inflation? Are the growth figures in excess of inflation? Has your required number taken inflation into account?
    I have factored in 3% growth  to my required annual number of £20k
    Which I thought was for inflation

    Would you say make this slightly higher

    How about the growth of the main £250k pot? I am only allowing a 1.5% annual growth, but know it will be significantly more than that. 

    The figures that I have used across the board for growth, in my head, are to counterbalance inflation, so the main Pot and pension stay static at today's value and gradually decrease as I remove circa £1k per month of capital from the pot.
    If it grows at a rate higher than inflation all well and good. 
  • michaels
    michaels Posts: 29,122 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Madrick said:
    You don't appear to have mentioned inflation? Are the growth figures in excess of inflation? Has your required number taken inflation into account?
    I have factored in 3% growth  to my required annual number of £20k
    Which I thought was for inflation

    Would you say make this slightly higher

    How about the growth of the main £250k pot? I am only allowing a 1.5% annual growth, but know it will be significantly more than that. 

    The figures that I have used across the board for growth, in my head, are to counterbalance inflation, so the main Pot and pension stay static at today's value and gradually decrease as I remove circa £1k per month of capital from the pot.
    If it grows at a rate higher than inflation all well and good. 
    We are a tiny bit off topic for this thread but I advocate doing retirement modelling in today money terms so for example I expect money held as cash to lose about 0.5% a year on average, bonds to gain about 0.5% and shares about 2%.  This means that I can visualise the amount of money in each future year as it is based on today's spending power so I don't have to be constantly thinking 'that 30k the model is showing me in 2045 is the equivalent of 20k in today's money'.

    Note also that returns can fluctuate a lot hence 'sequence of return risk' which means that something that should work 'on average' might not work if there are poor market returns or high inflation in the early years of retirement.
    I think....
  • LL_USS
    LL_USS Posts: 325 Forumite
    100 Posts First Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 15 April 2024 at 2:55PM
    I suppose it is a bit easier to estimate if we have a DB defined benefit pension element. I have been able to keep my outgoings as approx 2,500/m (not including mortgage) for the last couple of years, i.e. 30,000/year. Less spending for kids but more spending on myself in retirement so this figure in today's money as net income at retirement would be wonderful (say each month basic food 500, hols and entertainment 500, bill 1k, 500 for other things like giving grand children some pocket money :-). This means a DB of 23k/year, bridging with ISAs till full state pension to get 11.5K/year. After tax it comes down to 2,500/m net. That would be great :-). I just have to work for that target now.
  • hugheskevi
    hugheskevi Posts: 4,504 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    LL_USS said:
    This means a DB of 23k/year, bridging with ISAs till full state pension to get 11.5K/year. After tax it comes down to 2,500/m net. That would be great :-). I just have to work for that target now.
    Why bridge with ISAs rather than more tax-efficient DC pension?
  • LL_USS
    LL_USS Posts: 325 Forumite
    100 Posts First Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    LL_USS said:
    This means a DB of 23k/year, bridging with ISAs till full state pension to get 11.5K/year. After tax it comes down to 2,500/m net. That would be great :-). I just have to work for that target now.
    Why bridge with ISAs rather than more tax-efficient DC pension?
    You're right. DC contribution is more tax efficient yet I still want to have a bit of LISAs, a bit of ISAs due to the need to take money at different times earlier than retirement. Currently I still have more in the DC pension pot than in ISAs but I may have to stack more in ISAs to allow some big purchases in the next few years (and if not buying then I'll keep them longer).  For the bridging purpose I can draw on a combination of DC and ISAs.

  • Milltir
    Milltir Posts: 41 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    LL_USS said:
    This means a DB of 23k/year, bridging with ISAs till full state pension to get 11.5K/year. After tax it comes down to 2,500/m net. That would be great :-). I just have to work for that target now.
    Why bridge with ISAs rather than more tax-efficient DC pension?
    Isn't the preferred order of use of retirement savings cash/investments outside of ISAs, then ISAs, then DC pension? DC pension not included in one's estate. No expert - just asking...
  • hugheskevi
    hugheskevi Posts: 4,504 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 15 April 2024 at 5:25PM
    Milltir said:
    LL_USS said:
    This means a DB of 23k/year, bridging with ISAs till full state pension to get 11.5K/year. After tax it comes down to 2,500/m net. That would be great :-). I just have to work for that target now.
    Why bridge with ISAs rather than more tax-efficient DC pension?
    Isn't the preferred order of use of retirement savings cash/investments outside of ISAs, then ISAs, then DC pension? DC pension not included in one's estate. No expert - just asking...
    A quite reasonable order, setting aside things like retaining an emergency fund and perhaps a separate cash buffer if that is part of a plan to manage investment risk (although that could be held in any vehicle).

    However, the preceding question is what is the optimal asset allocation to reach minimum pension age with. ISAs provide access and flexibility whereas pensions provide valuable tax relief but no access.

    As minimum pension age approaches, the value of access and flexibility of ISAs declines (although perhaps not to zero, as pensions have the drawback of higher rates of tax should you need to withdraw a particularly large amount), and the drawback of no access to a pension drops away. Therefore why would you want to reach minimum pension age with lots of ISA saving when it could be in a pension instead and have benefited from tax relief. So when planning for funding between minimum pension age and State Pension age, DC pension is the obvious tool, with ISAs for any period prior to minimum pension age.

    Note that for these purposes LISAs are more akin to pensions, as they benefit from the government contribution.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.