📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Pensions Planning: The NUMBER

Options
1197198200202203287

Comments

  • My 18th birthday, mid-1970s, was a very financially restrained/constrained time. 

    Thatcher (and Reagan) may be reviled but (lights blue touchpaper and takes early retirement!) their economic policies arguably (very, very arguably) fixed the boom and bust cycles that we suffered back then. You have 3 hours ... discuss...
  • SouthCoastBoy
    SouthCoastBoy Posts: 1,084 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Not the biggest Maggie fan, think she created the start of the housing bubble due to selling off council houses. Awful policy imo. I could go on but dont think it is for here.
    It's just my opinion and not advice.
  • Silvertabby
    Silvertabby Posts: 10,157 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    Gatser said:
    The NUMBER is how much income you need to "live comfortably"
    So What's your number?
    Very important for pensions planning, to know what you are aiming for.

    My Number? (for a couple)
    I calculated: £22,000
    based on
    Food £5,000
    Car/transport £5,000
    Bills/Utilities £4,500
    Holidays/Leisure £4,500
    Clothing/Cash/Xmas/Other £2,000
    Repairs/replacements £1,000
    Just in case some had forgotten what the thread is actually about, this is the very first post.  ;)
    It's also important to consider how much the survivor will have to live on when the inevitable happens.
  • Wrists duly slapped.  I was though just making the point (attempting to be tongue in cheek) that we almost certainly don’t need to consider in the future the very, very high rates of inflation that were suffered in the past. If we had to do so then the NUMBER for many of us would be impossible to calculate.
  • Terron
    Terron Posts: 846 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Wrists duly slapped.  I was though just making the point (attempting to be tongue in cheek) that we almost certainly don’t need to consider in the future the very, very high rates of inflation that were suffered in the past. If we had to do so then the NUMBER for many of us would be impossible to calculate.
    Just work using current values.
    But unless you only have a fully inflation linked DB pension you do need to consider the possibilty of high interest rates.


  • Ibrahim5
    Ibrahim5 Posts: 1,271 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    We have sufficient funds to cover care home fees if needed and have planned our finances such that the survivor will be fine.

    Say a care home costs £1000 a week. A 10 year stay would cost £500K. Say your property is worth £500K that could be used for the last survivor. Do you keep £500K to pay for the first person? If 'the number' is how long is a piece of string then surely care home fee planning is worse. Most people need £0. 2 years is the average stay £100K. A 20 year stay would be £1M.
  • DairyQueen
    DairyQueen Posts: 1,856 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Ibrahim5 said:
    We have sufficient funds to cover care home fees if needed and have planned our finances such that the survivor will be fine.

    Say a care home costs £1000 a week. A 10 year stay would cost £500K. Say your property is worth £500K that could be used for the last survivor. Do you keep £500K to pay for the first person? If 'the number' is how long is a piece of string then surely care home fee planning is worse. Most people need £0. 2 years is the average stay £100K. A 20 year stay would be £1M.
    A 20-year care home stay would be way beyond the right side of the bell curve. Our home would cover £325000 of care home fees as, assuming this would apply only to the survivor, 50% of the value of our house would be ring-fenced in trust on the first death. Remember that (e.g.) care home fees of even £1000 pw would be partly covered by pension income. The balance could be covered by other assets.

    I think it would be appropriate to offer tax advantages for drawdown if required to cover care fees. 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.