We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Are the mortgage lenders being irresponsible?
Comments
-
And the affordability questions ignore inflation and changes in circumstances such as promotion and other wage increases.
They ignore them because they are not a given.
It's more a guess of what may happen in future. An optimistic guess at that.
If we wanted to include such things, you would also have to include the possibility of a loss of job, wage cuts, and other circumstances which could effect the borrower in a negative way.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »They ignore them because they are not a given.
It's more a guess of what may happen in future. An optimistic guess at that.
If we wanted to include such things, you would also have to include the possibility of a loss of job, wage cuts, and other circumstances which could effect the borrower in a negative way.
Then no one would get a mortgage, ever!0 -
-
Hi All,
Thanks for the replies. I really wasn't seeking advice on taking out that level of mortgage - it was a starting point for a discussion.
I feel that I am responsible and know that to save for children etc we couldn't afford that level. I was really using my situation to illustrate that to me the £189K amount seemed rather high and I think people, some people, would be tempted by that. For info though this is based on 90% mortgage.
So my point was while I think there is a responsibility of the mortgagee, I think I had expected some restrictions on what is being considered affordable - given what has happened over the last two years to the economy and banks etc.
I was just curious what other people thought.
Remember that you only have a MIP at this point in time. When it comes to purchasing a property the surveyor representing the bank may value the property lower than your offer price. So you are part way through the process.
A single person on the salary you quote takes home over £2600 per month ( a couple more) . So £1,100 for the mortgage repayments does not seem excessive. If you have all your finances in order.
The RBS is under pressure to lend money as part of the Governments bailout. Whilst 90% mortgages are available the criteria will be very strict. Also the interest rate on the product will reflect the risk.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »They ignore them because they are not a given.
It's more a guess of what may happen in future. An optimistic guess at that.
If we wanted to include such things, you would also have to include the possibility of a loss of job, wage cuts, and other circumstances which could effect the borrower in a negative way.
yes because that happens to everyone and nobody gets pay rises, inheritances, promotions etc, etc...:rolleyes:
quick Graham let's throw cold water on any possibility of anyone saying something positive on this forum...0 -
For crying out loud chucky.
Grow up.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »For crying out loud chucky.
Grow up.
you've lost me (again) - is nobody allowed to have a counter argument against your posts :rolleyes:
maybe this may educate you http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CounterargumentA counterargument might seek to cast doubt on the truth of one or more of the first argument's premises, or to show that the first argument's contention does not follow from its premises in a valid manner, or the counterargument might pay little attention to the premises and common structure of the first argument and simply attempt to demonstrate the truth of a conclusion incompatible with that of the first argument.0 -
Counter argue then. You think you are counter arguing?
I said:Graham_Devon wrote: »
If we wanted to include such things, you would also have to include the possibility of a loss of job, wage cuts, and other circumstances which could effect the borrower in a negative way.
You turn my talk of a possibility, which IS a possibility in everyones life into:yes because that happens to everyone and nobody gets pay rises, inheritances, promotions etc, etc...:rolleyes:
quick Graham let's throw cold water on any possibility of anyone saying something positive on this forum...
If you are classing that as a counter argument it's no wonder you keep losing pace.
You are simply turning one word into something completely different to suit your purpose and attaching a colourful icon to the end of it.
Hence, grow up.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »Counter argue then. You think you are counter arguing?
I said:
You turn my talk of a possibility, which IS a possibility in everyones life into:
If you are classing that as a counter argument it's no wonder you keep losing pace.
You are simply turning one word into something completely different to suit your purpose and attaching a colourful icon to the end of it.
Hence, grow up.
welcome to the Graham Devon show everyone!!! :T0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards