We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
CEBR: UK could drop out of the world's top 10 economies by 2015
Comments
-
But it stands to reason any country with a higher population or more natural resources could overtake our GDP, but does that mean we are getting poorer?
I would argue others are getting richer, but then also look at GDP per capita, that is more a gauge of how "rich" the country is the overall GDP figure does not show how thin that money can be spread.
Are we going to notice anything in terms of lifstyle..... most probably not.
Will there be much difference from being 1st, 3rd, 7th, 11th, 15th in terms of lifestyle for country's that have a similar GDP per captia.......most probably not.
We have to expect emerging nations to get a larger GDP than us as they have the capacity to get bigger.
I am happy on a small island as long as our lifestyle and GDP per capita is similar to other "big nations".
I don't think anyone is predicting we are going to get poorer, just other nations will get richer.
Any economy's built on selling natural resources will end up hitting a much harder brick wall than ours in the future.0 -
But it stands to reason any country with a higher population or more natural resources could overtake our GDP, but does that mean we are getting poorer?
I would argue others are getting richer, but then also look at GDP per capita, that is more a gauge of how "rich" the country is the overall GDP figure does not show how thin that money can be spread.
Are we going to notice anything in terms of lifstyle..... most probably not.
Will there be much difference from being 1st, 3rd, 7th, 11th, 15th in terms of lifestyle for country's that have a similar GDP per captia.......most probably not.
We have to expect emerging nations to get a larger GDP than us as they have the capacity to get bigger.
I am happy on a small island as long as our lifestyle and GDP per capita is similar to other "big nations".
I don't think anyone is predicting we are going to get poorer, just other nations will get richer.
I agree with what you are saying but a possible counterpoint could be the future value of the pound. If that declines quickly in value that would have a substantial impact on a trading nation such as the UK - employment levels would rise but buying power would fall.0 -
Lets hope we don't get another "socialist" government for another 30 years!!! Spent all our tax on bloating up the public sector to cover how they have massacred our manufacturing industry, lived on the never never and got us into massive debt.
When will we learn and stop voting them in?0 -
So it seems that the much more socialist model of the European countries produces richer and more productive countires than the Anglo saxon free trade model.
They have used restrictive trade processes to retain and support their industry (all against eu regulations) while we allow a free market and no longer own much of 'our' major industries (electricity, nuclear power, steel, coal, car manufacturring etc etc ); and presumably their unfunded state pensions aren't a liability either.
Best to find a 'proper' socialist party to vote for in futureEU tariff on agricultual product 12.2%
some dairy products 42.1% cloths 11.4%
EU Clinical Trials Directive stops medical advances0 -
I agree with what you are saying but a possible counterpoint could be the future value of the pound. If that declines quickly in value that would have a substantial impact on a trading nation such as the UK - employment levels would rise but buying power would fall.
I think if it looked like the £ was going to be weak for ever we would skip straight in to the euro. (mind you looks like Greece, Ireland and italy could drag that down a bit after the last 24H)
But even a weak £ would mean companies clambering to get in to the UK as a production base thus boosting GDP, then over time boosting the £ again. This would all be to the detriment of another manufacturing European nation.
I think the big nations "except Germany" will act like a merry go round for companies looking for European bases. They will all get periods where they will have the biggest competative edge (usually that will be a weak currency and large available workforce)
You never know we could end up as a manufacturing nation again.
I suppose what I am trying to say is what you lose in one respect you gain in another.
I would say GM's decision to cut most in Germany was down to costs of employment, a weaker currency is not in essence a bad thing as long as it is not too weak.
I would prefer to call it a more competitive currency, we are not going to be slipping back that far.
I think some think 15th will be 3rd world, in fact it just means some have emerged from 3rd world, not us slipping in to it.0 -
donaldtramp wrote: »Lets hope we don't get another "socialist" government for another 30 years!!! Spent all our tax on bloating up the public sector to cover how they have massacred our manufacturing industry, lived on the never never and got us into massive debt.
When will we learn and stop voting them in?
And of course Thatcher did loads for maufacturing :rolleyes:'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
I dont think these GDP figures, apart from jingoistic pride, are a very useful measure for most ordinary people of where their country stands in the world.
Apparently the UK surpassedGermany in GDP per capita during the boom.
Yet actually comparing the standard of living of the two countries objectively would obviously render this comparison absurd; as wealth in the UK is obviously vastly unequal; as evidenced by our decrepit public services and areas of almost 3rd world deprivation.0 -
As the world gets richer, the competion for assets is going to drive the prices up. We have just witnessed what happens when a limited supply of assets (houses) are chased by increasing credit ....i.e prices go up.
If the UK doesn't maintain it's purchasing power in the world we are going to have to settle for less goods at a more expensive price. Arguably the same as been happening to FTB and houses for years.0 -
Who cares about the state of the country anyway. House prices is up and that's all what matters apparently.
More bearish than bullish at the moment0 -
I don't see how Australia can overtake us, I read last week that they dont export anything at all !0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 262K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards