CSA Applying Liabilty Order?

DX2

millwall34 wrote: »

I understood the CSA can contact HM Paymaster.

You understood correctly, funnily enough still no child support :think:

snappylincs

Shall I go off and set up another thread to ask the question on peeps?

So you can continue taking this one off at a tangent and arguing amongst yourselves?

:mad:


FWIW, both parents are and should be held up against being fully financially responsible for their children, and the law should be changed to prevent allegedly "Self-Employed" parents from shirking the system.

Further to that, when the NRP insists on having all of their rights, but refuses to pay a penny, and outrightly goes to prevent such monies being paid - then they should have their "Parental Rights" curtailed, after all, "Rights" come with responsibilities.

I understand the courts won't let lack of maintenance be an issue in contact hearings, which FWIW is wrong IMHO.

DX2

snappylincs wrote: »

Shall I go off and set up another thread to ask the question on peeps?

So you can continue taking this one off at a tangent and arguing amongst yourselves?

:mad:


FWIW, both parents are and should be held up against being fully financially responsible for their children, and the law should be changed to prevent allegedly "Self-Employed" parents from shirking the system.

Further to that, when the NRP insists on having all of their rights, but refuses to pay a penny, and outrightly goes to prevent such monies being paid - then they should have their "Parental Rights" curtailed, after all, "Rights" come with responsibilities.

I understand the courts won't let lack of maintenance be an issue in contact hearings, which FWIW is wrong IMHO.

Oh the irony!

millwall34

snappylincs wrote: »

Shall I go off and set up another thread to ask the question on peeps?.

PM sent...

AnxiousMum

snappylincs wrote: »

FWIW, both parents are and should be held up against being fully financially responsible for their children, and the law should be changed to prevent allegedly "Self-Employed" parents from shirking the system.

Further to that, when the NRP insists on having all of their rights, but refuses to pay a penny, and outrightly goes to prevent such monies being paid - then they should have their "Parental Rights" curtailed, after all, "Rights" come with responsibilities.

I understand the courts won't let lack of maintenance be an issue in contact hearings, which FWIW is wrong IMHO.

Could you imagine if a pwc refused to spend any money to clothe, feed and house their child? Quite rightly, it would be severe form of neglect......yet NRP's who refuse to pay 'neglect' their children every day!

millwall34

AnxiousMum wrote: »

Could you imagine if a pwc refused to spend any money to clothe, feed and house their child? Quite rightly, it would be severe form of neglect......yet NRP's who refuse to pay 'neglect' their children every day!

I will disagree with that comment.

I do know someone whose son (ironocally he is 16 today!) was brought up by dad alone. Dad is a regular in our pub and his ex didnt want to know their son. Nobody said this is a severe form of neglect, it was her choice to go her own way and it was the CSA's choice not to do anything. Despite that, his son has turned out well, exelled at school and looking forqward to joining the Police.

AnxiousMum

She has still neglected her responsibilities toward her son though - doesn't mean that he will become nothing because of it, in fact, if that's the way she is, he's probably benefited from not having her around as an influence. It is still however, neglect of the child on her part!

Kimitatsu

Make an appointment to see your MP and get them to get involved - you would be amazed at how many powers the CSA can "suddenly" find to move things along a bit.

If he is in employment as well though then they could just apply a DEO without recourse to the courts anyway!

kaya

passport and licence's can be removed IF the nrp REFUSES to pay, its not the case if the nrp is UNABLE to pay though, i notice how everybody is keen to hang the nrp here despite having no knowledge of the circumstances whatsoever!