CSA 1 Dilemma...Getting Ridiculous

blimey40

:mad:Just posted a long post, but lost it .

Basics are

LO passed in the courts for 25k this January.
Since solicitor involved, very little contact from the CSA.

Are they waiting for 13 months, so I cannot appeal??

Started off with Newcastle in April, then moved to Jobseekers people in August?? I am self-employed and provided details. My daughter is now 24..No demands, no baliff letters etc. (though one at the start)..

They have provided DP files which indicate a number of flaws from the CSA. They say contact was tried to be made in 1996 and they were using a "confident address" which was never correct. I have provided most of the details requested, even the P45 from the supposed time this was to have started back in 1996. The DP files show one letter sent from 1997 to 2008. They have no details at all. Details wrong, even down to my date of birth. THE DP files show vague attempts to make contact around 1998 even goingto the prison service LOL, but no clerical input until 2008 on the CSA 1 files. (though one entry in 2004 suggests, I am probably unaware the IMA is in place)

I have provided payment details to the CSA in regards to my ex (who was on benefits), when I eventually made contact with her, from about 2001. I am not someone who has avoided my responsibilities, but someone who everyday has a 25k debt hanging over them, just because the courts accept the word of the CSA

A sensible conclusion should be reached, but will it?? 2 letters requesting details from the CSA have been issued since january, thats it

speedster

if they didn't make contact via a confident address, then they have no case.

i think nacsa may be the way forward for you. they're good at righting wrongs.

also, if it goes further down the enforcement route then they will be required to prove their case. ie, if it goes to a committal hearing (last resort) then they'll need to prove their case or it will be thrown out.

a LO means nothing. it establishes the debt in law, but that's all. they don't need proof to get a LO, but they need proof at a later stage.

also, may be worth getting your mp involved.