We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Second Question - Cars...

I have a low value £400 car which I understand I will be alllowed to keep.

My wife also has a similar value car of which I pay the insurance and tax etc on as she does not work.

I am allowed to include these costs on the I and E form?

Comments

  • alastairq
    alastairq Posts: 5,030 Forumite
    On the face of it, I would doubt it...would have to come from any surplus you may have. [mine does..I have a small m/bike as well...]

    However, consider this.....IF your own car is sub-1500cc, the VED due is around £100 pa....for a larger engined car, it'll be around £180 or so...assuming older cars, not subject to tax-by-emissions.

    Therefore, if both cars are in the lower VED bracket, it's possible you might be able to claim expenditure equal to that expected of a larger-engined car?

    all of which I didn't tell you, as it's vaguely cheating....and I shall deny all knowledge, etc...or plead senile dementia...
    No, I don't think all other drivers are idiots......but some are determined to change my mind.......
  • debtinfo
    debtinfo Posts: 7,012 Forumite
    depends on how thorough the examiner is, i used to check the tax band of the car
    Hi, im Debtinfo, i am an ex insolvency examiner and over the years have personally dealt with thousands of bankruptcy cases.
    Please note that any views i put forth are not those of my former employer The Insolvency Service and do not constitute professional advice, you should always seek professional advice before entering insolvency proceedings.
  • Captain_Longbeard
    Captain_Longbeard Posts: 69 Forumite
    edited 17 November 2009 at 7:55AM
    This is only from my experience - but I think a number of other factors could influence this. Do you have any children, do you use your car for work (so leaving your wife/kids without transport), how far from the nearest school and or supermarket do you live. You already have said that your wife doesn't work, so this makes her a dependant of you, and so reasonable expenses can and will be allowed.

    Depending on those answers, you may be allowed to include it. If however, you can or do use public transport for work, and your schools and shops are near, then the OR may not allow it, and may insist on just the one car.


    I don't think it's all clear-cut, and also depends on the OR, and as Alistair says, though, there is always the surplus...

    BTW - my car was worth less than 900 (and needed some work on it, and a service - and after costs for them taking it and selling it on I didn't think they would take it, but they did)...

    Good luck
  • fiveyearplan
    fiveyearplan Posts: 10,145 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    It isn't just about cost either, if the car, for example is worth relatively little (£400) and does not run they would take it for sure as it is a liability issue.

    :j :j


  • alastairq
    alastairq Posts: 5,030 Forumite
    A point missed so far is that.....whilst [for work purposes, or after successful negotiation] the OR may allow a BR to retain a car....if the BR [or family] has a second vehicle [or third!]...then..if the value is very low...[ie bordering on scrap value]...the OR may be able to offer the BR an opportunity to purchase the interest in that [those] vehicles.

    This is what happened to me.

    So....providing the actual value of other family vehicles is sufficiently low, it is then up to the BR to place bids with the OR, at least equal to what the OR may have gained by claiming the extra vehicles.

    The arguments in favour of the BR taking this action, for low value vehicles, is obvious.....it will cost the OR to recover and dispose of said vehicles, therefore the residue will be even lower....and with current OR workloads, no resonable offer would be refused...[I offered scrap values....gratefully accepted!]


    So lay some money aside to purchase the interest in your wife's car, if needs be?
    No, I don't think all other drivers are idiots......but some are determined to change my mind.......
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.2K Life & Family
  • 260.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.