We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Complaint against Lender

I am currently going through a complaints process with my lender and sitting here waiting for the weekend to pass is killing me so I thought I'd get your opinions.

I am in the process of house selling/buying and were hoping to set an exchange date this week only to learn that our lender has withdrawn our mortgage. Their reason for doing so is because our vendor has only recently acquired the property and it is their policy not to give mortgages on properties that have been owned for less that six months.

The dispute we are having is that this is not new information to them, I disclosed it from the very beginning and they have recorded telephone conversations of me clearly giving this information, including a conversation with the underwriter.

They have admitted responsibility in as much they have talked about reimbursing our survey fee and paying our legal costs but I have not accepted this. Whilst I respect they have their policy for a reason I feel that given the circumstances they should run whatever checks they deem necessary on my vendor until they satisfy themselves there is nothing untoward afoot and reinstate my mortgage as nobody made me aware of this policy through the application process and there is no mention of it in any of the paperwork I have received.

I am still waiting a decision but not getting good vibes from them. What does everyone else think? Do I have a leg to stand on? I have my mortgage with them currently so am an existing customer.

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,033 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Do I have a leg to stand on?

    Legally, no. Lenders can withdraw at any time prior to contracts being signed.

    In the case of fairness though you may have a case. Problem is that no matter how hard you complain the lender does not need to lend to you and the FOS (or FSA) cannot force them to lend to you. So, a reimbursement of fees and a goodwill gesture are most likely if they do not change their mind.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.