We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Psychology of Home Owning
Comments
-
Harry_Powell wrote: »Interesting how your figures only go to 2008, and so don't cover the house price crash?
We're not talking about BTL, we're talking about renting instead of buying your primary home, so any figures that include rental income as part of the return, are completely bogus.
No, the stock market returns are til 2008. So they missed out the worst of the stock market crash, which works in your favour.....:rolleyes:
The housing market return uses the long term average, which is still, as of 2009, inflation plus 2.9% per year. The long term inflation average is 3.9%.
The returns from rent MUST be counted. Because if you're not making it as a return by renting your property as a BTL, then you are saving it by living in it and not renting someone elses property. If it makes you feel better, you can subtract the 5% from the investors income instead.
It;s the same result..... Buying a house beats renting and investing by a significant margin. But here, I've swapped the rent cost around so you get it. I also forgot to include tax, so the renter is even worse off than I first thought.
The average return for the stock market from 1929 to 2008 was 8.9% per year. 4.6% in capital growth, plus 4.3% in dividends. MINUS 5% for rent, leaves a return of just 3.9%, BEFORE tax.
The average long term return for the UK housing market is inflation plus 2.9%. Average long term inflation (RPI) is 3.9%. Net return of 6.8%.
So in fact, housing beats stock markets by an average of 2.9% per year, when you include the costs or returns of rent.“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
A lot of this seems to hang on a) if mortgage interest is higher or lower than rent, b ) how much HPI we're factoring in, and c) how much rent rises we're factoring in
(all presumably for an intended duration of stay - rather than a flat 25 years? unless of course your next move is to the kind of place you will stay 25 years)
Which is good! I think the idea here is that buying is better than renting (or vice versa) depending on your view of the 3 factors above (in the timeframe of intended stay) - (could add in your views on future IR at time of refix in 2,3,5 years also if you wanted?)Prefer girls to money0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »No, the stock market returns are til 2008. So they missed out the worst of the stock market crash, which works in your favour.....:rolleyes:
The housing market return uses the long term average, which is still, as of 2009, inflation plus 2.9% per year. The long term inflation average is 3.9%.
The returns from rent MUST be counted. Because if you're not making it as a return by renting your property as a BTL, then you are saving it by living in it and not renting someone elses property. If it makes you feel better, you can subtract the 5% from the investors income instead.
It;s the same result..... Buying a house beats renting and investing by a significant margin. But here, I've swapped the rent cost around so you get it. I also forgot to include tax, so the renter is even worse off than I first thought.
The average return for the stock market from 1929 to 2008 was 8.9% per year. 4.6% in capital growth, plus 4.3% in dividends. MINUS 5% for rent, leaves a return of just 3.9%, BEFORE tax.
The average long term return for the UK housing market is inflation plus 2.9%. Average long term inflation (RPI) is 3.9%. Net return of 6.8%.
So in fact, housing beats stock markets by an average of 2.9% per year, when you include the costs or returns of rent.
Which stockmarket are you talking about? Where are you getting these figures from?
If I buy a house, my investment return hinges on how property prices move in my area, indeed in my street. With more fluid investments, I can invest in the UK, EU, US, PAC rim, Asia, Australia, etc. etc. I can also balance my portfolio every 6 months and cash out of funds that are doing badly and move into funds that are doing better (all for zero cost, I might add). If your house investment isn't doing well, you can move to a better performing area but it'll cost you £10k to do it, take 3 to 6 months or more and cause untold stress and pain. You certainly can't move your property out of the UK and into a country that is booming.
I think though that we have a complete impasse on this topic, so I'm going to leave it there. Thanks for the input, it's been interesting. Good luck with your HPI.
"I can hear you whisperin', children, so I know you're down there. I can feel myself gettin' awful mad. I'm out of patience, children. I'm coming to find you now." - Harry Powell, Night of the Hunter, 1955.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
