We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
London home 'needs £93,000 wage'
Comments
-
Its confusing, because the impact of wages in not confined to the City -as the ask and the oak explains-, nor (patches of) London, but the ''stockbroker belt'' too.0
-
The population of the City is around 8,000 imoPrefer girls to money0
-
the_ash_and_the_oak wrote: »So you would only really be removing prices not wages if you did that imo?
So only the mega rich in the city it's self then.
So £350K is around the average house price down there then.:eek:0 -
So only the mega rich in the city it's self then.

So £350K is around the average house price down there then.:eek:
I really don't know who lives in the 'actual City' (very few actual places obv) - if even city workers. As for the impact of city wages I think as stated just prior - this is probably felt across the southeast rather than specifically in London itselfPrefer girls to money0 -
So only the mega rich in the city it's self then.

So £350K is around the average house price down there then.:eek:
350k is about right for an average house in and around London.
For a decent house in a decent area - 450-650k
For a very nice detached family house in nice ares 550k-850k ish.
Very very nice home 850K and beyond. near me, 2-3m.
Welcome to London. And even if you spen 2m, you will have a council block/estate within 5 minutes walk.0 -
So I suppose the next point is that town wages and prices are really a bit false.
I used to live in a town where the average wage was around £18K but the average property was over £200K.
The reason for that was that no one really worked in the town, it was a very nice commuter town but had no way of supporting prices other than it's looks and it's locality to well paid jobs.0 -
the_ash_and_the_oak wrote: »I really don't know who lives in the 'actual City' (very few actual places obv) - if even city workers. As for the impact of city wages I think as stated just prior - this is probably felt across the southeast rather than specifically in London itself
i understood really2 to be talking about the actual entire City of London, rather than just the financial district, known as 'The City'
because as you say, their aren't many actual places to live around there, and those that are there will just be company appartments above offices
unless i've got the wrong end of the stick
Please take the time to have a look around my Daughter's website www.daisypalmertrust.co.uk
(MSE Andrea says ok!)0 -
I have very low paid worker friends who live in the City: in flats above bars etc. (rented.) The mega rich don't just live in the City Really, the London centric ones live in other Londn lacations, others come in from ''Posh'' home county locations. The point is there is no one place you can isolate this wage to.
Ah, then seen Monkfish's post. Yes, the distinction is needed Really...:) (although the problem is mitigated but not resolved by refering to London as opposed to the City imo.)0 -
inspector_monkfish wrote: »i understood really2 to be talking about the actual entire City of London, rather than just the financial district, known as 'The City'
because as you say, their aren't many actual places to live around there, and those that are there will just be company appartments above offices
unless i've got the wrong end of the stick
This would make more sense (just looked, over half the popn of The City live in the barbican complex). But then what do we mean? Remove city workers salaries and the houses they live in? But how do we do this? the former is easy but is the latter? (and what proportion of city workers live outside London and in commuterbelt?)Prefer girls to money0 -
the_ash_and_the_oak wrote: »This would make more sense (just looked, over half the popn of The City live in the barbican complex). But then what do we mean? Remove city workers salaries and the houses they live in? But how do we do this? the former is easy but is the latter? (and what proportion of city workers live outside London and in commuterbelt?)
yep, and alot of those barbican flats are company owned, or 2nd homes for people that work in the city, but commute from far outPlease take the time to have a look around my Daughter's website www.daisypalmertrust.co.uk
(MSE Andrea says ok!)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards