We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Why people want BoE rate to rise?

2456789

Comments

  • purch
    purch Posts: 9,865 Forumite
    If i were in charge they'd be 1.5% by the year end and 3.5% by year end 2010

    Luckily for all of us, that you are not in charge.

    That is unless you want to see 25% unemployment, and a recession so deep we might never get out of it !!! :eek:

    I would like there to be an economy left, so my children might stand a chance of getting a job when they are old enough !!!
    'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'
  • kennyboy66_2
    kennyboy66_2 Posts: 2,598 Forumite

    Its not good for the economy as a whole to have an imbalance like this.

    Higher rates would encourage more saving, which would be good in the long-term.

    But, the household savings rate at the moment is 5.6% (Q2 2009) and the highest it has been since 2003 and higher than most times during the last 10 years.

    Increased interest rates at the moment would have little impact on the household savings rate - it will increase anyway through fear.
    US housing: it's not a bubble

    Moneyweek, December 2005
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Really2 wrote: »
    If you overpay yes, as you hedge your rate.

    For some maybe. But for most significant overpayments aren't a priority.
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    mitchaa wrote: »
    If i were in charge they'd be 1.5% by the year end and 3.5% by year end 2010.

    You missed off because you have sold you house now.:rolleyes:
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    For some maybe. But for most significant overpayments aren't a priority.

    Also trackers usually have no redemption penalty. So it is good for being highly mobile in terms of reacting to the market.

    So if they are good now you can still adjust in the future without penalty.

    was it £8bn overpaid last quarter, I would say that would mainly be people on trackers, would you?
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    kennyboy66 wrote: »
    But, the household savings rate at the moment is 5.6% (Q2 2009) and the highest it has been since 2003 and higher than most times during the last 10 years.

    Increased interest rates at the moment would have little impact on the household savings rate - it will increase anyway through fear.

    To rebuild wealth through savings will take a long time. In 2007 the savings rate was the lowest since 1960.

    The rate of 5.6% will be heavily skewed towards the higher paid.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Really2 wrote: »
    Also trackers usually have no redemption penalty. So it is good for being highly mobile in terms of reacting to the market.

    So if they are good now you can still adjust in the future without penalty.

    was it £8bn overpaid last quarter, I would say that would mainly be people on trackers, would you?

    Maybe not.
    Although the base rate has been at its all-time low of 0.5 per cent for over six months now, new research suggests that some tracker mortgage borrowers are not taking the chance to make overpayments .

    According to Unbiased.co.uk, 53 per cent are not
    paying off more now to reduce the size and term of their debt, despite there currently being prime opportunity to do so with such low rates .

    Only one in five has kept their
    repayments at the same level as before the recession, the figures state.

    The report also showed that some are using the
    money they could be saving on their mortgage to treat themselves, while others are paying off different debts .

    http://www.mortgages.co.uk/news/2009/Sep/tracker-mortgage-customers-fail-to-overpay.html
  • mitchaa wrote: »

    If i were in charge they'd be 1.5% by the year end and 3.5% by year end 2010.


    you and that bl00dy crystal ball
    i'm gonna come upto aberdeen and smash it into a thousand pieces !!
    Please take the time to have a look around my Daughter's website www.daisypalmertrust.co.uk
    (MSE Andrea says ok!)
  • IveSeenTheLight
    IveSeenTheLight Posts: 13,322 Forumite
    Pensioners are having to eat into their small amounts of capital now that interest returns have been limited.
    With low rates, deliberately to discourage saving in order to stimulate consumption, what happens when the savings run out...?

    What would happen to the capital if they don't utilise it and their time comes to an end?
    I'm more believing in ski'ing when I retire (Spend Kids Inheritance) rather than passing it on.
    I earnt it, I should utilise it.

    Pensioners earnt their savings, they should utilise it as they wish

    If you really have concern for pensioners, it might be worth considering those with no savings, not about those that do.
    :wall:
    What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
    Some men you just can't reach.
    :wall:
  • IveSeenTheLight
    IveSeenTheLight Posts: 13,322 Forumite
    Really2 wrote: »
    You missed off because you have sold you house now.:rolleyes:

    It's okay, his wife will have final say and she does not want to stay off property ownership ;)
    :wall:
    What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
    Some men you just can't reach.
    :wall:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.