My case Now with "jobcentre Plus"

blimey40

Does anyone know what this means?


thanks in advcance

CMAC_2

Dont hold me to it but I think it might have something to do with the Commission asking JCP to adjust your payment as Job Centre plus now deal with the former Income Support Cases ??

blimey40

That makes sense as it was with Enforcement earlier in the year. The CSA had enforced an IMA, but they are still at this stage sticking with the IMA, based on not having enough information??

My solictor has suggested to them, we have supplied all the information. We talking about going back to 1996, some of the earlier stuff is sketchy.

The liable amount from the DP files is £4,000 now as opposed to £42,000, but they seem reluctant to go with the lower figure at this stage. I guess, they want to explore all avenues first??

CMAC_2

blimey40 wrote: »

That makes sense as it was with Enforcement earlier in the year. The CSA had enforced an IMA, but they are still at this stage sticking with the IMA, based on not having enough information??

My solictor has suggested to them, we have supplied all the information. We talking about going back to 1996, some of the earlier stuff is sketchy.

The liable amount from the DP files is £4,000 now as opposed to £42,000, but they seem reluctant to go with the lower figure at this stage. I guess, they want to explore all avenues first??

You will need to supply the evidence before they do the IMA conversion I dont think it could be that.

kelloggs36

Have you established what info is missing? They can accept 'best evidence' which is below the normal criteria, but which is probable eg if you estimated your housing costs to be £70 per week rather than £500 per week under CS1 then the £70 per week stands a high chance of being accepted - even in the absence of concrete proof.

NACSA_CHAIR

HI Kelloggs...its been forever since I was on here last, been so busy!! But glad to see you are still about. :0)

blimey40

Trouble is what is best possible evidence?

Banks don't hav records past 6 years, this case closed in 2005.

Getting old housing costs pre-2000 is like looking through a needle in ahysatck. I'm not one of these people that keep records.

I just hope a sensible solution is reached. I have given as much info as humanly possible. They seem to focusing on previous work, as opposed to housing. In those cases they have the details (self employed).