We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Mortgage exit fee written up in Key Facts

I took out a 2 year fixed rate mortgage with Alliance and Leicester back in December 2006. The key facts I was given stated that £295 was payable for their Redemption Administration Charge. I've read the posting and articles about claiming back on Mortgage Exit fees but they seem to be for people who were charged more than what they originally signed on for.

Have people managed to claim successfully in my situation? Even though it was written from the beginning, I'm hoping it is claimable on the basis that the charge is much higher than their true administration costs.

Any help or suggestions? Thanks.

Comments

  • koexelek
    koexelek Posts: 7,847 Forumite
    Don't think you will have much luck there.

    Although £295 is indeed an excessive charge, the fact they stated it up front ( and you agreed to proceed on that basis) really negates any case you might have.

    People got joy where the lender stated a figure up front, then subsequently increased it
    I am a Mortgage adviser
    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • koexelek wrote: »
    Don't think you will have much luck there.

    Although £295 is indeed an excessive charge, the fact they stated it up front ( and you agreed to proceed on that basis) really negates any case you might have.

    People got joy where the lender stated a figure up front, then subsequently increased it

    Thanks for responding. I thought so but I also agreed to the credit card and bank charges they stated up front (e.g. going overdrawn or late payments) but many people including myself have successfully claimed back on these with interest. I'm happy to give it a punt to see what happens but would be more confident/enthusiastic if I know people in similar situation have been successful.
  • _Andy_
    _Andy_ Posts: 11,150 Forumite
    There is nothing to claim back in this case.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,015 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    The lenders often included the exit charge as part of their overall pricing. A&L in particular did it for years and wasnt an issue as they tended to offer very good deals each time one expired and if you stayed with them you never paid that £295.
    I'm hoping it is claimable on the basis that the charge is much higher than their true administration costs.

    It is not a penalty charge and doesnt have to reflect the costs.
    I thought so but I also agreed to the credit card and bank charges they stated up front (e.g. going overdrawn or late payments) but many people including myself have successfully claimed back on these with interest.

    Thats because those charges are penalty charges and have to reflect the cost. The exit charge is not a penalty charge.

    The FSA ruling was quite clear that it was only the difference between what was quoted at the start and what you pay at the end that can be refunded.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • dunstonh wrote: »
    The lenders often included the exit charge as part of their overall pricing. A&L in particular did it for years and wasnt an issue as they tended to offer very good deals each time one expired and if you stayed with them you never paid that £295.



    It is not a penalty charge and doesnt have to reflect the costs.



    Thats because those charges are penalty charges and have to reflect the cost. The exit charge is not a penalty charge.

    The FSA ruling was quite clear that it was only the difference between what was quoted at the start and what you pay at the end that can be refunded.

    Thanks for the clarification. One less job on my big to do list :p
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.