NEW BLOG. Featuring tips and pics from pet owners of the MSE Forum, we present to you Homemade pet toy ideas. Take a look
'Is MSE getting too Political on bank charges?' blog discussion
in Martin's blogs & appearances & MoneySavingExpert in the news
7 replies 2K views
Former_MSE_Lawrence Former MSE
This is the discussion to link on the back of Martin's blog. Please read the blog first, as this discussion follows it.
Read Martin's "Is MSE getting too Political on bank charges?" Blog.
Click reply to discuss below.
This discussion has been closed.
Latest MSE News and Guides
Energy Price Cap change
Martin Lewis on what it means for youMSE News
Best £1 you've ever spent?
Share your most impressive bargainsMSE Forum
New MSE Forum avatars available
Try 'em out nowMSE Forum
For those who want to know, my position is people with limited funds who may have made small mistakes and who banks have imposed high charges on should be spoken up for. I am willing to pay more for my banking for fairer charging. I don't agree that all cases will be deserving, for example irresponsible spending or badly run businesses should not be rewarded. Banks owe it to the majority of their customers, and I believe it is the majority, who have not incurred bank charges to be fair in how they correct any wrongs.
What a strange opinion? Where would we be without campaigning journalism . Its a long standing bastion of important social change. What is important is that if there is an agenda it is unambiguous, and out in the open.
It could equally be argued that I am wrong by telling people that store cards at over 25% interest are the devils debt and should be avoided like the plague unless you pay them off in full and just want the sign up benefits. Should I be balanced and say "though they're very positive for the companies as they're profitable so you may want to think about that before you don't use them."
Of course there are some dangers in journalism, for me the real issue is journalists who hide their aims, persuing agendas or personal vendattas yet try to describe it as unbiased.
Some even lie to those they purport to work for once deciding they’ve got a story, find out its not true, but try and push it forward regardless Yet they are dangerous and a discredit to the profession.
Yet taking a principled stance on a wide ranging issue trying to campaign to help the public is a key part of being a journalist. Yet you must let those you work with be aware you are doing so - and that you are agenda'd.
When I work on programmes about bank charges, I also make sure the production staff know my stance before hand (which they usually do) and try often to make sure the viewer is aware of the stance.
Depending on the role Im in I will put the other perspective too when needs be. Bank charges especially has been well debated - no one can deny the massive PR and legal might of the banks - and I've engaged in person, in public and in private with the BBA on it.
Please note, answers don't constitute financial advice, it is based on generalised journalistic research. Always ensure any decision is made with regards to your own individual circumstance.
Wondering if Martin had approached this a little naively, given Cameron's exploitation of the populist value deriving from the number of subscribers to the MSE email, snd the not very veiled suggestion that Martin does the research work on this issue, rather than the Shadow Cabinet themselves, then the Conservative Party take the credit, I clicked to read the discussion thread ......
that's odd; it seems to no longer be there
Was your opening sentence really a question?
The opinion is not really that strange. It does appear in the media at present that there is only one opinion and that is frustrating if it means that people do not know the consequence of their actions. How happy will people be in several years time when there is no more free banking?
Many people who manage their finances sensibly think the escalation of this issue is the end of free banking for the sake of a quick windfall by those who are irresponsible in managing their bank accounts. I have been annoyed when a slight slip-up leads to banking charges bein imposed on me but a polite letter pointing out my loyal custom and usually good management of my account has ALWAYS resulted in the charges being withdrawn. People who habitually do not manage their accounts should be charged for this and I for one find the slating of banks and zealousness of people bragging (on these forums) about how much they are reclaiming from the banks quite sickening. And of course it is much easier to be lazy and do nothing at the time you are being charged and wait several years until someone produces a template for you and makes it easy.
No doubt many of the people making these large claims are the same ones who voted to convert most of the building societies to banks several years ago, take their windfall pay-outs and now wonder why banks are only interested in their shareholders and not their customers.
The banks will win in the end - not this issue perhaps but overall they will find a way to make back their money. Presumably those making the reclaim applications don't mind that because the cost will be spread among all of us.
Finally, it is not at ALL the same as you suggesting someone takes out a high interest store card. No-one is suggesting that as a pro-consumer campaigner you should consider the banks but how about the rest of us who manage our bank accounts well and had the sense to vote for the building societies to stay mutual and who will undoubtedly pay for all this?
If we press the issue without political support, we would be branded 'rebels' or 'anarchists' or 'reactionary'; if we press the issue WITH the support of politicians, we are accused of becoming 'too politicised'!
Just wish this whole business would hurry up and be resolved once and for all.