We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

The Affordability scam explained

Turnbull2000
Turnbull2000 Posts: 1,807 Forumite
edited 21 August 2009 at 9:55PM in Debate House Prices & the Economy
http://www.scribd.com/doc/17827322/View-From-the-Mountain

Read on from page 13.
Many commentators today argue that, as most people borrow money for a house rather than pay in cash, comparing the price of houses vs. earnings, inflation, or rents is misleading. They dismiss how much a property actually costs as irrelevant, going on to say that it only matters how much it costs to borrow the money to buy it. They claim that the true measure of affordability is solely the cost of servicing the mortgage payments - if the initial monthly payment is a high percentage of take home pay then the house is relatively “unaffordable”, if it is a low percentage of take home pay then the house is relatively “affordable”. Simple, no?
In summary, affordability is based on the unlikely premise that rates will remain low, however if they do, so will salary inflation and total mortgage repayments over 25 years far surpass those of the higher rate era. In the 'unaffordable' 80's, mortgage repayments relative to salary halved in 7-10 years. In today 'affordable' environment, the repayment burden will not ease by a similar margin for at least two decades should inflation continue on it's subdued path. Should rates and inflation rise, then your stellar loan will have stellar repayments to match.

Lose, lose. But great for the lenders.
Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
«13456711

Comments

  • PasturesNew
    PasturesNew Posts: 70,698 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I am banned from scribd.
    :)
  • nearlynew
    nearlynew Posts: 3,800 Forumite
    Good article that.
    "The problem with quotes on the internet is that you never know whether they are genuine or not" -
    Albert Einstein
  • As someone that went through 15% mortgage rates the first time, I can assure you that it sucked.

    Wage inflation nowhere near kept up with general inflation, as wage increases LAG other price rises. People were permanently skint because of that.

    Prices today are much more reasonable on so many things, mortgages included, and now that control of interest rates has been passed from government to MPC, the return of shockingly high interest rates is near to impossible.

    When we took out our latest mortgage, at 2.7 times income (now less than 2 times income remaining due to pay rises and overpaying :D) we checked what it would be at 15%, and we could afford it, just. It would be horrible, but it could be done.

    If we can afford it, so can others.

    And interestingly, the average loan multiple of actual house buyers according to CML is still only 3 times income for FTB's, and 2.75 for second buyers, and it never crossed 3.5 times income even at peak.

    So most people are in a similar boat to us in this regard. The mass waves of repo's are not going to happen with base rates at 0.5%, and they're not going to happen with rates at 5%, and in reality, they wouldn't happen unless rates crossed 10%, and even then, most people would still choose to pay the mortgage rather than buy other stuff, so the real economy would get hammered by high rates far worse than the housing market. (another reason it's staggeringly unlikely to ever get that high again)

    Low-ish rates are here to stay. The targeting of inflation with rates by the MPC is effective, and a range of 3% to 5% seems to work rather well. It doesn't stop asset bubbles, but thats not the remit of the MPC.

    Crashaholics dreaming of super high interest rates spurring a "next leg down" are doing just that....... Dreaming.
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker

    Crashaholics dreaming of super high interest rates spurring a "next leg down" are doing just that....... Dreaming.

    Well that I do believe you have experience in, so I shall take it seriously.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The targeting of inflation with rates by the MPC is effective, and a range of 3% to 5% seems to work rather well

    2% ;) Inflation

    Rates will rise if as need arises to control.

    Seems like they missed the housing bubble though.
  • Thrugelmir wrote: »
    2% ;) Inflation

    Rates will rise if as need arises to control.

    Seems like they missed the housing bubble though.

    Asset bubbles are not within the MPC's remit.

    Inflation is.

    Controlling inflation to 2% has never required interest rates in double digits. There is no reason to suspect it will now.

    Affordability is the key measure of house prices now, it has been for the last decade or so, and it will remain so for the future.

    And those who think we will see double digit base rates again are deluded.
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • LydiaJ
    LydiaJ Posts: 8,083 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker Mortgage-free Glee!
    Thanks Turnbull2000. I've always felt slightly uneasy that I couldn't see where the extra money came from in the "buy something small and trade up a few years later" concept. This article has filled in some gaps for me.
    Do you know anyone who's bereaved? Point them to https://www.AtaLoss.org which does for bereavement support what MSE does for financial services, providing links to support organisations relevant to the circumstances of the loss & the local area. (Link permitted by forum team)
    Tyre performance in the wet deteriorates rapidly below about 3mm tread - change yours when they get dangerous, not just when they are nearly illegal (1.6mm).
    Oh, and wear your seatbelt. My kids are only alive because they were wearing theirs when somebody else was driving in wet weather with worn tyres.
    :)
  • SingleSue
    SingleSue Posts: 11,718 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    My salary certainly jumped in the late 80's early 90's...my normal payrises were in the region of 27%, my lowest being 17%!

    And that was when I wasn't moving companies, one such move saw my salary double in one fell swoop.

    We weren't skint either....regular holidays (only in this country), cash paid for a car (second hand), out every night of the week and oodles in savings enough to pay for a wedding, house deposit and still have a healthy cushion all in the space of 1 month.

    Life was certainly sweet back then....even if I worked my butt off to have that life.
    We made it! All three boys have graduated, it's been hard work but it shows there is a possibility of a chance of normal (ish) life after a diagnosis (or two) of ASD. It's not been the easiest route but I am so glad I ignored everything and everyone and did my own therapies with them.
    Eldests' EDS diagnosis 4.5.10, mine 13.1.11 eekk - now having fun and games as a wheelchair user.
  • LizzieS_2
    LizzieS_2 Posts: 2,948 Forumite
    My wages in the 80's were circa £60pw - I could have gained a mortgage if house prices were at early 70's rates but not the 80's rates.

    When I did eventually get a mortgage my income was much higher than the equivalent of todays minimum wage - it was still a struggle then as it was a huge proportion of income.

    It doesn't really matter what decade you first buy in - unless you are lucky, you will always find it hard to get to the first hurdle.
  • I disagree.






    Its 3 celebrities at most.
    Not Again
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.