We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
How many bedrooms is adequate?
Comments
-
-
Graham_Devon wrote: »Yer, but this isn't insurance. And I would argue a bathroom is habitable anyway, just to be difficult
I know Graham but the fact is any room that is not a kitchen or a bathroom is classed as habitable. (HA, councils still take insurance on properties so they would have to state habitable rooms, even if it is only liability)
The reasons kitchens and toilets are not included is hygiene.
A lounge is a room. It is only a lounge if you put a TV and a sofa in it. (most probably a sofa bed to dual use it)
You were wrong on the article I don't see there being much point on carrying on about it if people who live there have told you the situation.0 -
You were wrong on the article I don't see there being much point on carrying on about it if people who live there have told you the situation.
I'm only saying I was confused, as the person who told me I didnt understand, then talked about using a 4 room apartment consisting of 3 bedrooms and a dining room.
The lounge was not included, nor the kitchen or bathroom.
On the first explanation, I would have called that house a 5 room apartment. 3 beds, dining room, lounge.
But that seems to have changed now?
Therefore, as most, if not all social homes have no dining room, in the example bailey used, it would work out as a 3 room apartment, because it had 3 bedrooms. Therefore, were back to square one.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »I'm only saying I was confused,
Single Person 1 or 2 = a bedsit or 1 bedroom + 1 living
Single pregnant woman 3 = 2 rooms (bed) + 1 living (living)
Couple 3 or 2 = 1-2 bed rooms + 1 living
Family with one child 3 = 2 beds + 1 living
Family, two children of same sex under 13 years old 3 = 2 beds 1 living
Family, two children of same sex one or more aged over 13 years 4 = 3 beds one living
Family, two children not of same sex (irrespective of childrens age) 4 = 3 beds 1 living
Family, three or more children 4 or 5 = 3-4 beds 1 living (perhaps dual use)
I cant see anything confusing about it?0 -
Why should a single person (on benefit) be provided with a separate flat when most of the singles on low income do stay in a shared accommodation? This way the councils can reduce the expense and actually help more people!
AFAIK, if you count the number of apartments in a house it usually includes the lounge, bedrooms and any separate dining room.I am neither a bull nor a bear. I am a FTB, looking for a HOME, not a financial investment!0 -
I know someone in a 2 bed flat with 3 young daughters. They wont rehouse them until the eldest is 10.
I am led to believe there is a shortage of 3 bed properties as most of these were snatched up under the Thatcher years and the stock has never really been replaced.Retail is the only therapy that works0 -
I know someone in a 2 bed flat with 3 young daughters. They wont rehouse them until the eldest is 10.
I am led to believe there is a shortage of 3 bed properties as most of these were snatched up under the Thatcher years and the stock has never really been replaced.
Exactly right."An arrogant and self-righteous Guardian reading tvv@t".
!!!!!! is all that about?0 -
abinanthanb wrote: »Why should a single person (on benefit) be provided with a separate flat when most of the singles on low income do stay in a shared accommodation? This way the councils can reduce the expense and actually help more peopleRetail is the only therapy that works0
-
Why should same sex room sharing be truley problematic during puberty years? A little awkward at times, sure, but hey, isn't life a little awkward at times?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.1K Spending & Discounts
- 244.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards