We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
End of the road for super-low trackers
Thrugelmir
Posts: 89,546 Forumite
Before too much excitement is generated by low repossesion rates. The next move in the game will affect many.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/property_and_mortgages/article6797510.ece
Thousands of homeowners who have been paying the best-ever mortgage rates of 0% are braced for a huge repayment shock in the coming weeks.
They face a tough decision as to whether they should remortgage, especially after the Bank of England’s quarterly inflation report last week suggested interest rates could stay lower for longer.
Borrowers who took out “super-low” two-year tracker mortgages with Halifax, the Co-op and Birmingham Midshires in the summer of 2007 have been paying 0% on their loans since Bank rate fell to 0.5% in March. Those on Cheltenham & Gloucester’s (C&G) deal at 1.01 percentage points below Bank rate have been paying 0% since rates fell to 1% in February. However, all face a jump in repayments of as much as £8,000 a year as deals revert to standard variable rates (SVRs) as high as 4.24% this month and next.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/property_and_mortgages/article6797510.ece
0
Comments
-
FallenAngel9898 wrote: »Interesting, I'm sure the people on those rates new that 'All good things.........'. That's the bad news for the housing market really, that at best rates can only stay the same for so long, inevitably though, they must rise from their current base.
Maybe they've lost their jobs already and been hanging on in hope......0 -
I thought most of these deals were lifetime trackers. Certainly what I gleaned from reading on here and thought most BTL's had them.0
-
Thrugelmir wrote: »Before too much excitement is generated by low repossesion rates. The next move in the game will affect many.
Again?
Bears have been rolling out this same old tired trite nonsense for several years now.
YYYYYYYYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWNNNNNNN
Wake me up when annual repo figures are at least more than one month of sales......:rolleyes:“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
Mine is lifetime, BR +.95, it was only BR +0.25 for the first two years.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0
-
Graham_Devon wrote: »I thought most of these deals were lifetime trackers. Certainly what I gleaned from reading on here and thought most BTL's had them.
All of mine are certainly lifetime trackers, 4 at 0.68% and one at 0.38% above the boe base rate.
For the borrows that are on only a limited tracker period, I cannot understand why the article claims that it would it be a 'shock' to them to return to the standard variable rate, what on earth did they expect to happen when the discounted period ended? I can't wait for the author's next article:
Sunday to follow Saturday shocker will catch out landlords!Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
Let me rephrase this to make more sense:HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »Again?
Bulls have been rolling out this same old tired trite nonsense for several years now.
YYYYYYYYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWNNNNNNN
I can see why your posts were vetted on HPC. You are like a record, stuck in a groove sprouting the same old tired rubbish day after day.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Before too much excitement is generated by low repossesion rates. The next move in the game will affect many.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/property_and_mortgages/article6797510.ece
When they took out the mortgage in the summer of 2007, were they paying 0%? A small glance tells me that BOE rate was hovering around 5% during that time. Why should it be shocking if the IR goes back to the range at which these people actually started their mortgage?!!! :mad:I am neither a bull nor a bear. I am a FTB, looking for a HOME, not a financial investment!0 -
chucknorris wrote: »All of mine are certainly lifetime trackers, 4 at 0.68% and one at 0.38% above the boe base rate.
For the borrows that are on only a limited tracker period, I cannot understand why the article claims that it would it be a 'shock' to them to return to the standard variable rate, what on earth did they expect to happen when the discounted period ended? I can't wait for the author's next article:
Sunday to follow Saturday shocker will catch out landlords!
Spot on!! :TI am neither a bull nor a bear. I am a FTB, looking for a HOME, not a financial investment!0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Before too much excitement is generated by low repossesion rates. The next move in the game will affect many.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/property_and_mortgages/article6797510.ece
i don't see how this would be a shock to anyone.
mortgage rates are historically low on average, they have to go up at sometime in the next 12/24 months.
what the article does tell us is that you should of have taken or you should take advantage of any long term fixes that are below or just over 5% to buy a house or even remortgage.
btw - i have a 4.69% 5 year and 0.9% life time tracker on my residential property.
high rates don't scare me.0 -
abinanthanb wrote: »When they took out the mortgage in the summer of 2007, were they paying 0%? A small glance tells me that BOE rate was hovering around 5% during that time. Why should it be shocking if the IR goes back to the range at which these people actually started their mortgage?!!! :mad:
No they wouldn't have been. They have truly benefited from the lowering of base rates though. They are rentering a world where interest rates are increasing again though with no similar mortgage product for the future.
If they haven't used the "saved" money wisely. Well its their own fault.
Soon all that will left is those with life time trackers. Which are a small minority of total mortgage holders.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
