We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Percentages
Gorgeous_George
Posts: 7,964 Forumite
If child No 3 increases the cost from 20% to 25% and child No 2 from 15% to 20%, why isn't child No 1 just 5%?
Is 10% for the ex wife?
GG
Is 10% for the ex wife?
GG
There are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those that don't.
0
Comments
-
Certain costs are fixed. Therefore a sliding scale would seem appropriate.0
-
I agree more children cost more, but think about it if the couple were still together:
Child 1 comes along and x% of income is spent on them. Child 2 comes along, costs will go up, but other than child benefit (keeping it simple here) income does not. More children can mean a larger house is required and larger household bills, but as the income stays the same, the couple would simply have the same to spend irrespective of how many children there are.
Put into csa perspective, the cost should be the same % irrespective of number of children involved.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards