We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Liam Halligan gets all doomy in the Torygraph

2»

Comments

  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    mbga9pgf wrote: »
    We will see who the cowboys were in 10 years from now. Bitter pill now will avoid a lot of pain down the road.

    So you think we should have increased interest rates with recession beckoning and deflation a real possibility :eek:
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • mbga9pgf
    mbga9pgf Posts: 3,224 Forumite
    No. I think we should have taken the free market fix as closely as possible. They shouldnt have been slashed as quickly. I also believe QE should have been done with and IR penalty to go with it, say 0.5% per 100 Bill QE. This effectively caps the max amount of QE.

    Which doesnt include propping up asset prices unneccesarily. I also think the market could have done with one or two of the bigger banks going bust.

    The Abandonment of moral hazard is something that is going to come and bite us all in the !!!! one day.
  • DiggerUK
    DiggerUK Posts: 4,992 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 26 July 2009 at 10:25PM
    mbga9pgf wrote: »
    We will see who the cowboys were in 10 years from now. Bitter pill now will avoid a lot of pain down the road.

    I can't see what pill there is on the market that will deal with the problem that is faced.

    Raising interest rates to halt an inflation that doesn't exist is pointless.
    Lowering interest rates can't be done.

    Credit wont be available until the banks have eliminated toxic debt (TD) The money they have is to keep them solvent for when the TD's need to be written off. The banks know were these dead bodies are hidden, we haven't a clue at the moment.
    We don't know how much the government do either.
    As LH says in his article "the banks need to be made to 'fess up to their debts"

    Unless the masters of the universe come up with a new solution they will be left with QE.
    As the Bond Vigilantes won't stump up unless they get their pound of flesh what point is QE.
    QE is not deflationary.
  • Edale
    Edale Posts: 246 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    I have never been sure how you get the banks to fess up to their debts, is this their current potential exposure to bad debts or with further potential property price declines factored in? A mortgage at 90% ltv a year ago would be in negative equity now. Many forecasters are still looking at further drops in property prices and if the banks factored this in when working out their bad debts it could lead to a vicious downward spiral. As prices declined banks would have to 'refess' up to their debts and the decline would continue.
  • DiggerUK
    DiggerUK Posts: 4,992 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Edale,
    I think the main problem with forcing the banks to 'fess up, is that they don't know how to find out the real state they are in.

    I think it would be like those situations we found ourselves in as kids when our parents turned round and said "why did you do that" and we replied by saying "don't know" and we really didn't know

    I think the simple truth is that they really don't know what has been going on. The profits kept coming in and nobody bothered to ask the what's and whys.

    C0ck up theory beats conspiracy theory every time, and here's the proof.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.