We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Charging Order? The myth
Options
Comments
-
boomans12
Overreaching occurs in this situation as two or more owners sell their property to a third party for a "valuable consideration" (which is normally for money but could also be for a debt owed.) As transferring property ownership doesn't include this factor, overreaching doesn't occur so the Restriction remains in place.
However......... given what you've stated, you should be able to go back to Court to get the Restriction removed IF you can prove in Court that your ex partner, legally, had his beneficial interest in the property removed prior to the date the Charging Order was granted. So, I'd check that out first.
0 -
Ok thank you, I wish I had done the transfer form in the first place 😢0
-
The courts won’t talk to me and I’ve just tried to talk to a solicitor who said they need his consent , he won’t consent because he doesn’t care! No one seems to be able to help me because the debt is in his name.
0 -
Hi all,
I have read lots of this thread but still a little confused re the wording on the restriction on my deeds, can someone help please?
I was in an IVA (joint with partner) 12 years ago, paid 4 years and then lost my job so they failed the IVA. Never heard from any of the creditors since and have a clear credit file.
I now want to sell my property which I own with my partner but there is a restriction on it, this reads:
(26.07.2012) RESTRICTION: No disposition of the registered estate by the proprietor of the registered estate is to be registered without a written consent signed by Mark Allen of Grant Thornton UK LLP, Waters Edge, Clarendon Dock, Belfast, BT1 3BH.
Is this something I can get solved seen as the IVA was classed as failed? Grant Thornton were the original IVA provider.
My solicitors have written to Grant Thornton and aren't getting any replies!
Thanks in advance for some advice.
0 -
neilo43 said:Hi all,
I have read lots of this thread but still a little confused re the wording on the restriction on my deeds, can someone help please?
I was in an IVA (joint with partner) 12 years ago, paid 4 years and then lost my job so they failed the IVA. Never heard from any of the creditors since and have a clear credit file.
I now want to sell my property which I own with my partner but there is a restriction on it, this reads:
(26.07.2012) RESTRICTION: No disposition of the registered estate by the proprietor of the registered estate is to be registered without a written consent signed by Mark Allen of Grant Thornton UK LLP, Waters Edge, Clarendon Dock, Belfast, BT1 3BH.
Is this something I can get solved seen as the IVA was classed as failed? Grant Thornton were the original IVA provider.
My solicitors have written to Grant Thornton and aren't getting any replies!
Thanks in advance for some advice.
Form RX3 would have to be submitted along with suitable evidence that the interest protected by the restriction is no longer valid. Your solicitor should be aware of this and our PG 19 section 3.7.3 explains how to apply“Official Company Representative
I am the official company representative of Land Registry. MSE has given permission for me to post in response to queries about the company, so that I can help solve issues. You can see my name on the companies with permission to post list. I am not allowed to tout for business at all. If you believe I am please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com This does NOT imply any form of approval of my company or its products by MSE"1 -
boomans12 said:The courts won’t talk to me and I’ve just tried to talk to a solicitor who said they need his consent , he won’t consent because he doesn’t care! No one seems to be able to help me because the debt is in his name.
Action may be necessary against your ex-partner as if he's still a joint owner you are not going to be able to remortgage without his involvement anyway and if the debt remains it just makes it harder.“Official Company Representative
I am the official company representative of Land Registry. MSE has given permission for me to post in response to queries about the company, so that I can help solve issues. You can see my name on the companies with permission to post list. I am not allowed to tout for business at all. If you believe I am please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com This does NOT imply any form of approval of my company or its products by MSE"0 -
Hi I am dealing with my late fathers estate. I put his house up for sale my mother pre deceased him. There is a caution on the house and when our conveyancer applied to remove it, my mothers former employer has claimed they want payment for an outstanding amount. This related to when she was found guilty of theft and false accounting. This was 30 years ago so they want the amount plus 30 years interest. They have no coroborating paperwork from the court case which has now all been destroyed. My conveyancing solicitor has been unhelpful on this point though to be fair not their area of experise. My question is can they claim an amount without producing the original court order or any correspondence at all for that matter relating to this caution?
Being completely unaware of this prior to putting the house on the market the house is sold, this is the only unresolved issue holding it up. Can anyone advise?0 -
Noble101 said:Hi I am dealing with my late fathers estate. I put his house up for sale my mother pre deceased him. There is a caution on the house and when our conveyancer applied to remove it, my mothers former employer has claimed they want payment for an outstanding amount. This related to when she was found guilty of theft and false accounting. This was 30 years ago so they want the amount plus 30 years interest. They have no coroborating paperwork from the court case which has now all been destroyed. My conveyancing solicitor has been unhelpful on this point though to be fair not their area of experise. My question is can they claim an amount without producing the original court order or any correspondence at all for that matter relating to this caution?
Being completely unaware of this prior to putting the house on the market the house is sold, this is the only unresolved issue holding it up. Can anyone advise?0 -
Noble101 said:Noble101 said:Hi I am dealing with my late fathers estate. I put his house up for sale my mother pre deceased him. There is a caution on the house and when our conveyancer applied to remove it, my mothers former employer has claimed they want payment for an outstanding amount. This related to when she was found guilty of theft and false accounting. This was 30 years ago so they want the amount plus 30 years interest. They have no coroborating paperwork from the court case which has now all been destroyed. My conveyancing solicitor has been unhelpful on this point though to be fair not their area of experise. My question is can they claim an amount without producing the original court order or any correspondence at all for that matter relating to this caution?
Being completely unaware of this prior to putting the house on the market the house is sold, this is the only unresolved issue holding it up. Can anyone advise?
Once processed and providing the application is sufficient we will usually notify the cautioner and give them a chance to consent/object
If they object then their objection would be treated on merit in the same way your own application will have been up to that same point.
There is no 'normal' other than the process we follow. Every single property, caution and more is unique and can only be properly assessed based on application made and information received as part of that process“Official Company Representative
I am the official company representative of Land Registry. MSE has given permission for me to post in response to queries about the company, so that I can help solve issues. You can see my name on the companies with permission to post list. I am not allowed to tout for business at all. If you believe I am please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com This does NOT imply any form of approval of my company or its products by MSE"0 -
Land Registry Rep
Regarding the above, what would be the LR view if the creditor failed to respond to your letters?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards