We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Can somebody explain these deals... have I missed something ?
illuminate
Posts: 285 Forumite
Looking at offers to extend my existing mortgage from my current lender (C&G) in order to buy out my ex. Found these on their website.
4.69% Fixed until 31 October 2011 2.50% for the remainder of the term 3.0% APR £495
Yes until 31/10/11
4.69% Fixed until 31 October 2011 2.50% for the remainder of the term 3.0% APR £995
Yes until 31/10/11
What I find strange is that 2 deals look exactly the same in terms of period and interest rate, yet one comes with a £495 arrangement fee, the other with £995.
Why would this be so ?
What also confuses me is that the cost calc for each gives me the same figure, yet as the arrangement fee is added onto the balance, should the latter not be higher given that they are interest only.
One other question. The equivalent variable rate deals only seem to offer a 0.1% saving on the interest rate. Where is the appeal in that, given that there is so little scope for the payments to go anywhere but up over the next few years ? (Other than the fact that they are available for LTVs up to 80%)
4.69% Fixed until 31 October 2011 2.50% for the remainder of the term 3.0% APR £495
4.69% Fixed until 31 October 2011 2.50% for the remainder of the term 3.0% APR £995
What I find strange is that 2 deals look exactly the same in terms of period and interest rate, yet one comes with a £495 arrangement fee, the other with £995.
Why would this be so ?
What also confuses me is that the cost calc for each gives me the same figure, yet as the arrangement fee is added onto the balance, should the latter not be higher given that they are interest only.
One other question. The equivalent variable rate deals only seem to offer a 0.1% saving on the interest rate. Where is the appeal in that, given that there is so little scope for the payments to go anywhere but up over the next few years ? (Other than the fact that they are available for LTVs up to 80%)
0
Comments
-
illuminate wrote: »4.69% Fixed until 31 October 2011 2.50% for the remainder of the term 3.0% APR £495
Yes until 31/10/11
4.69% Fixed until 31 October 2011 2.50% for the remainder of the term 3.0% APR £995
Yes until 31/10/11
What I find strange is that 2 deals look exactly the same in terms of period and interest rate, yet one comes with a £495 arrangement fee, the other with £995.
Why would this be so ?
The first one is for loans of up to 60% of the value of the property, the second is for loans of up to 75% of the value of the property. Higher LTV carries more risk for the lender.What also confuses me is that the cost calc for each gives me the same figure, yet as the arrangement fee is added onto the balance, should the latter not be higher given that they are interest only.
If you click through to the "how much will I pay" page, you'll see this:
Where a product fee applies, it will be added to your new mortgage. You can then pay the fee off if you want to, or leave it on your mortgage to spread the cost. ***If you pay it off within 30 days of the start of your mortgage, no interest will be charged on it. If you leave it on your mortgage, interest will be charged on it as part of your main mortgage. As this will increase your loan amount, it will also affect the monthly payment on the main part of your mortgage.***
In other words, the calculation provided does not include interest paid on the fee.0 -
The higher fee relates to loans above 60% of value of the property, reflecting the slightly higher risk in lending.illuminate wrote: »Looking at offers to extend my existing mortgage from my current lender (C&G) in order to buy out my ex. Found these on their website.
4.69% Fixed until 31 October 2011 2.50% for the remainder of the term 3.0% APR £495
Yes until 31/10/11
4.69% Fixed until 31 October 2011 2.50% for the remainder of the term 3.0% APR £995
Yes until 31/10/11
What I find strange is that 2 deals look exactly the same in terms of period and interest rate, yet one comes with a £495 arrangement fee, the other with £995.
Why would this be so ?
It is higher. By 0.0002% on a £100k loan over 25 years. But it is more than reasonable for the lender to quote the rate to 2 decimal places.What also confuses me is that the cost calc for each gives me the same figure, yet as the arrangement fee is added onto the balance, should the latter not be higher given that they are interest only.
I would strongly consider sticking on the 2.5% SVR for a time and overpaying. This is (check your terms and conditions) a tracker at 2% above the BofE rate. Why not enjoy the low rate for a bit and chip away at the capital? Keep an eye on the fixed market, because at some point you may wish to jump on to one, but I think you should be able to enjoy 12-18 months paying a lot less.One other question. The equivalent variable rate deals only seem to offer a 0.1% saving on the interest rate. Where is the appeal in that, given that there is so little scope for the payments to go anywhere but up over the next few years ? (Other than the fact that they are available for LTVs up to 80%)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.5K Spending & Discounts
- 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards