We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
CSA have phoned out of the blue.
len111
Posts: 21 Forumite
Asking on behalf of a friend, he has had a phone call out of the blue saying he has to pay 9K as he is in arrears.
He has been paying direct to his ex for the entire time. Also paying for item for both his girls. She has even told the CSA this when they phoned.
Is he still liable, what should he do?
He has been paying direct to his ex for the entire time. Also paying for item for both his girls. She has even told the CSA this when they phoned.
Is he still liable, what should he do?
0
Comments
-
When did the CSA first get involved - did he get a call ages ago? Did he fill out any forms? Was it agreed to be direct pay? What evidence does he have that he paid his ex?0
-
He had a form previously, and signed it and said he would pay his ex direct.
He then got a letter saying no you have to pay us direct.
Then another letter saying no its fine pay the mother and the amount.
As far as eviedence just the two of them saying.0 -
As long as the PWc confirms this then it will be ok for any arrears he owes - it would be up to both of them to contact the agency to confirm this and that they are happy with maintenance direct or if the parent with care wishes to use the agency to set collections of the regular maintenance
HTHComp Wins 2011 : Cant wait to start listing everything:j:j:j0 -
is it more complicated if she is on benefits?
additionally its 2002 -03 only, at which point he was doing agency work. work for 2 weeks then nothing.
does this make the a difference?0 -
Probably - if he didn't pay during that time? If she was on benefits during that time, then the money will be owed to the secretary of state and not the PWC.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards