We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Can we end boom and bust?
Comments
-
-
Well, without wishing to argue but not sure why its a bigger omission? Surely they are both about the same size.
Let's settle on "you win some, you lose some"
ok -but that doesn't mean that you and me are internet buddies :money:
ps. you always want to argue. you've become Mr Angry0 -
ps. you always want to argue. you've become Mr Angry
OK OK, I did lose it with you, and... perhaps... that was unfair. But let's not argue over who was right and who was wrong (you were wrong). I'm not suggesting a truce either, just I need to rein back my desire to attack you.0 -
Only an idiot would claim they could bring an end to boom and bust!0
-
-
Only an idiot would claim they could bring an end to boom and bust!
Kept people voting Labour, that is until they saw the lie with their own eyes.
One could argue that it was an intelligent move.Favourite hobbies: Watersports. Relaxing in Coffee Shop. Investing in stocks.
Personality type: Compassionate Male Armadillo. Sockies: None.0 -
As soon as I see someone sitting on a beach and sucessfully telling the tide not to come in, then I will believe we can have an end to boom and bust.
The trouble with just prescribing "more regulation" seems to ignore the fact that we have had booms before when the regulatory burden was higher, The late 80's housing boom was not hugely different to this one - not much buy to let then, but plenty of people banding together to utilise Miras before it went.
When we have the next boom under tighter regulation, what will we demand then - yet more regulation ?
You either have more regulation and government interference in free markets, or you enjoy more freedom to make your own decisions without government telling you what you can do.
We can't have our cake and eat it.US housing: it's not a bubble
Moneyweek, December 20050 -
richardlionheart wrote: »well he definately ended the boom !0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards