csa help please... well more NRP help lol

brians_daughter

marksoton wrote: »

Anyone who has 4 holidays a year and drives a new BMW would do well to sustain that when on benefits !

Anyway thats his problem. CSA route i say and let him wriggle and squirm. The man is deluding himself and is an idiot. I find it very hard to defend NRP's when one's like this exist.

And the threat of deprivation of income will loom as well. Might want to point that out to the idiot.

Good luck.

Thnaks, i will have to do some digging about as to the 'deprivation of income' as i have never heard of it and will need to have the facts prior to speaking to csa or nrp re this!

speaking up for nrp my brother is a nrp and has 3 jobs so he can keep a roof over his families head whilst providing for his other 2 children.. he works 12-14 hour days 6-7 days a week on a regular basis . its just infuriating when you are personally involved with both ends of the spectrum!

kelloggs36

Blob wrote: »

Untill it gets to a Court and he can prove that his income is what he said and just why he is out of work. The Judge will then go for the CSA big time and in my view rightly so.

If someone is driven to make statments that are on teh spure of the moment through frustration then they will not be upheld by a Court, been there done that!

If you now want to take the line that people dont get frustrated with the CSA look at the post here, and as they say try again!

When would it get to court? When he hasn't paid? If that is the case, then I can't see that a judge will ignore the law which states that the CSA are perfectly within their rights to ignore such a change in circumstances that the NRP has deliberately brought about themselves to avoid paying child support. The NRP is more likely to appeal to a tribunal first, and if the tribunal uphold the CSA decision the judge can't over-ride the decision made. If the NRP states to the CSA by phone or by letter that this is his intention, he/she have well and truely stuffed themselves!

Blob

Just like to make it clear it was not me that made the comments that the Court did not take into account! The Court has had to step in to defend more than 1 CSA twit when I have had him in a Court of Law. They then find out I have been trained to question people.

However in the event that he will not appeal to TAS then it will go to Court as either the CSA will take him there or he will appeal against a decision that they will make arbuterally!

kelloggs36

If he appeals against the decision it will have to go to TAS. If CSA take him to court then the courts do not have jurisdiction on how the assessment was calculated, only that he owes the money, which he will under the CSA rules.

Blob

Then they will and can say how much he has to pay to his arrears, it is covered by form N245, they issue a warrent and bingo, the CSA are stuck with it and there is not one thing they can do. He sticks to that and they can go take a running jump, all enforcment action has to be suspended!

kelloggs36

That's as maybe, but it doesn't change the ongoing liability which is the point - he will still have to pay the full amount eventually.

brians_daughter

thanks guys... the car is registered in his sisters name, or so he says - then 'i cant get my hands on it' not that i want it as i have my own car lol. He only works - or is only contracted to 26 hrs per week, his partner is contracted to the same hours they work together. their jobs are minimum wage jobs... or so they have said in the past ' minimum wage jobs usually have little stress so we will work for easy money and get the tax credits and housing benefit' their words to me in the past.

Also, his tax credits are based on last years calculations when he was self empolyed and only declaring £40 pw in wages (the rest was fiddled so his books reflected a low income incase i ever wanted to involve csa) Again, they have been very upfront in telling us this...so i expect this years tax credits will go on that figure. He is out for what he can get out the system.

I am just looking for furter info online as to what if anything i can do to ensure that my son gets what he is entitled to! We wouldnt wnat the money if we could afford for my son to continue his activities as he always has done but as a budding young sports person it costs a lot and all we want is a contribution towards these costs! anyone would think i was being unreasonable!