We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
where do you think house prices will be in 10 years?
Comments
-
That would improve things, certainly LIR. But it would require a 'sea-change' as Cleaver said, to bring about such a change, wouldn't it? We in the UK are so entrenched now in our desire to own our own home, aren't we?
Our attitude to living is changing..nbot to housing yet, because our system dictates that IMO.
If more single people had access to secure tenancies, and their money, that seems as valid, more valid than many equity release and rent back schemes, for example.
When the buy versus rent arguemnt comes up here the common complaint is security. So, make it more secure!
I honestly believe it is not in everyones financial best interest to buy. (I honestly believe it is in many people's financial interest to buy too, just for balance) but the system is unfair as it stands: in tax on the savings in forms other than property, in benefits etc etc. In the way BTL is taxed too.
Its all very well we who can afford to buy bleating on, but I think morally, those who would be better in a more equal system, with secure tenancies, risk most under current system.
How can people change when the system holds them?
Poeple are restricted from changing. Apart from those who have always had to rent to be prudent, they are penalised IMO, and it seems feel 'second class' as it is. 0 -
bo_drinker wrote: »Just so as they can keep up with or better the Jones's as it has always been. Houses, cars 4wd, Hi fi tv etc etc etc. It's not going to be that easy for a few now though. Frugle will be the new bling.

This may sound like going off track a bit. But I have been wondering how we have moved from one economic way of life to another in the past.
On second thoughts, I'll start a new thread : - )0 -
-
Who knows - at some point we may get a non-corrupt government who will pour money into social housing (and all them working-class construction workers) instead of slinging most of the invented dosh at their future (non-job) 'employers'.
Drat - 5 mins before we hit April 1st...0 -
In 2019 a house worth 150k today will be worth 300k.
Thats what I think.0 -
I predict an average price house now will be worth an average price house in 20190
-
If you combine a massively rising population with a house building programme fallen way behing govt. targets, its not difficult to see that in a few years house prices will be back to their peak of last year.
Supply and demand.Thankyou Sir Alex for 26 years0 -
Security may be an issue when deciding whether to buy or rent but the reason I am glad I bought is that now I have retired I am very happy that I do not have to pay rent out of my limited income.
Also just another thought house prices double in the early 70s when borrowing rules were very strict0 -
The peak price in Q4 1989 was £61,495 and took 8 years for house prices to recover to the same level (Q3 1997 = £60,794). Current trends in prices are slightly higher in percentage terms and indicate recovery to peak 2007 prices will take about 10 years so 2019 prices = Q3 2007 prices.
http://www.nationwide.co.uk/hpi/downloads/UK_house_price_since_1952.xls
I predict a good time to buy will be around 20140 -
:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:
Man you're cracking me up with these gags tonight.
Why ?, 2007 lending collpased the banks, so I guess what you're saying is banks will be collapsing again in the future when start lending as they did before. I would suggest they won't lend to that level again. Not rocket science, but if you're VI won't allow you to see what is pretty obvious then the debate is over.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards