We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Going self employed

2»

Comments

  • marksoton
    marksoton Posts: 17,516 Forumite
    They have changed slightly, there was a shake up of CIS4 a couple of years ago that got people worried. The employer just arranged for a third party to pay the going rate though.

    LTD companies do have ways round it,one engineer i have on site has done work exclusively for us for 3 years.
  • pd001
    pd001 Posts: 871 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    marksoton wrote: »
    They have changed slightly, there was a shake up of CIS4 a couple of years ago that got people worried. The employer just arranged for a third party to pay the going rate though.

    LTD companies do have ways round it,one engineer i have on site has done work exclusively for us for 3 years.

    How does that work then?
  • marksoton
    marksoton Posts: 17,516 Forumite
    pd001 wrote: »
    How does that work then?

    Well i am pretty sure the tests would be similar to those mentioned by soubrette. Like i say there are legitimate ways round it ( the bloke we have works through an agency ). The construction industry has been like this for decades.

    I have been told by some blokes about an older system ( SC60 i think ) where it was just ridiculous. People were claiming back tens of thousands of pounds in rebates !

    Funnily enough HMRC pulled the plug on it ;)
  • Soubrette
    Soubrette Posts: 4,118 Forumite
    My ex is a computer contractor so a different area to the building trade but the way we 'got' round it was firstly ensuring that the contract was one of services - based on billable projects rather than just for payment for time. A good substitution clause, use of own laptop where appropriate etc - basically trying to fulful as many of the 'tests' as feasible.

    Things were made more complicated as IR35 allowed different contracts to be examined and some may and may not be deemed as coming under those rules.

    I think the main thing was keeping your head down and not acting in a suspicious way to HMRC :p

    Sou
  • marksoton
    marksoton Posts: 17,516 Forumite
    Soubrette wrote: »

    I think the main thing was keeping your head down and not acting in a suspicious way to HMRC :p

    Sou

    I agree, however that can be said about all dealings with HMRC ! Don't take the proverbial :D
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.