We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Harriet Harman today
Comments
-
Not a good advert for Polygrip !.................
....I'm smiling because I have no idea what's going on ...:)0 -
You weren't the only one who thought she "was as useless as ever, unsteady, inarticulate, hectoring, self-satisfied.""I'm not even supposed to be here today."0
-
They are all a bunch of
Not Again0 -
I could think of a few things I would like her to perform.
I quite fancy her... sorry if that upsets those with a weak constitution.
!!!!!!, I just had my breakfast!In case you hadn't already worked it out - the entire global financial system is predicated on the assumption that you're an idiot:cool:0 -
To balance this a little, its not as if I can think of a man in the cabinet I find particularly attractive. I'm no 'feminist' and I'm not a HarrietHarman fan, but I think its fair to point out she's a Labour politician, and not trying to be a model 0
-
I love the hopeless planted question by a sycophant. Junior Labour back bencher says " would you agree with me that the Labour party has done something wonderful", and Brown, or Harman, take some time as if they are considering it and reply that "yes we are doing very well".
It's pathetic. And a criminal waste of PM questions. Democracy for the nursery.
Yes, I always thought that question time was for the oppostion to ask questions. Government MP's have a fast track to the PM anyway.
That's what comes of having a Labour speaker. Betty Boothroyd was so much better.0 -
Boothroyd was Labour too, wasn't she?dealsearcher wrote: »That's what comes of having a Labour speaker. Betty Boothroyd was so much better.
0 -
lostinrates wrote: »Boothroyd was Labour too, wasn't she?
Yes but a Conservative government put her there.
Labour put their own person in as speaker.0 -
Harriet Harman is a perfect example of the pitfalls of positive selection.
She has no ability whatsoever, and certainly doesn't deserve to be in high office.
I agree, she's hopeless. Her performance yesterday was truly dire.
I'm astounded that she's being touted as a possible successor to Brown.
If Labour are to have any hope of gaining office at the next election they need to ditch Brown and replace him with someone of substance, not a political lightweight like Harman.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards