We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Gilt auction failure.
Comments
- 
            but what about the inflation risk? surely that would affect the investment?
 Of course you need to factor that into any Investment decision.
 You could always Invest it in Equity's and receive no return at all :eek:'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'0
- 
            Having read through the thread there are some very useful points.
 I was struck by the accusation in the news that Mervyn King was out of line to criticise the government, even obliquely, by stating that a further fiscal stimulus is not a good idea. If he had said nothing the government would say that he agreed with them. If he says something it is said that it is not his place to do so.
 If it is not the place of the governor of the bank of england to voice concerns who can?0
- 
            One could of course take the view that the Governer stated the blinding obvious.
 Only here it seems that the blinding obvious is considered worthy of 24 hour wall to wall news coverage (slow news day).
 Tomorrow (or a day or two) it will of course be forgotten and rightly so.0
- 
            Meanwhile, over the pond ... things don't look that much better.
 In an early sign that Washington may have to pay more to finance huge stimulus plans to fix the economy, investors hesitated at buying a government debt issue on Wednesday, forcing the Treasury to pay a higher interest rate than expected.
 While the government ended up paying only a fraction of a percentage point more to sell the notes, the tepid response set off a sudden decline in stock prices, though they recovered in the last hour of trading. The news also led some experts to wonder whether investors’ appetite for Treasuries — considered safe investments — is beginning to wane.
 Full story here:
 http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/26/business/26markets.html?_r=1&ref=businessIf many little people, in many little places, do many little things,
 they can change the face of the world.
 - African proverb -0
- 
            I've said this before and I'll say it again. Everybody who has been buying gilts recently has been nuts (ok, I'll exclude ones close to maturity if you insist).
 At a time when everybody believes inflation is looming who would want a fix rate return, and who would pay a lot for it making the yield extremely small?
 Until now the answer has been everyone. The only reasons I can think of are:
 1) Fear of the markets causing a flight to a safe haven.
 2) In the very short term they were expected to rise because of no 1 above, plus falling interest rates, plus the expectation of QE buying pushing prices up.
 Those are all very short term views. It is now slowly starting to dawn on the idiots who bought that the short term spike is over and nobody wants to take them off their hands.
 Expect gilt prices to plummet. Soon the government will be the only buyer of its own debt. It's a crazy world we live in.0
- 
            A gilt sale failing to sell a small proportion of whats on offer. OK so that puts us in line with Germany, who had a similar result in early January, and still better than Spain who had to cancel a sale completely due to lack of demand.
 Its a warning shot from the market alright, but its not as if they're only firing in our direction.
 Am I right in thinking that these were the first gilts being sold with such a long period (40 years) attached to them?0
- 
            Rochdale_Pioneers wrote: »Am I right in thinking that these were the first gilts being sold with such a long period (40 years) attached to them?
 Some (all?) War Bonds were undated so these aren't the longest ever sold. I can't recall Gilts with maturities of 40 years being sold in the UK before but I'm not an expert.0
- 
            Am I right in thinking that these were the first gilts being sold with such a long period (40 years) attached to them?
 No
 The first conventional 50 year Gilt was issued on 4th April 2006 at 4 1/4 %
 There were a couple of Index Linked Gilts of that duration issued in 2005
 Since then there have been quite a few 40 and 50 year duration issues.'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'0
- 
            isn't it a good time to invest in corporate bonds? That's what H-L are saying anyway. I'm opening an account with them and will be investing some £.0
This discussion has been closed.
            Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
 
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

 
          
          
         