We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Deflation? For whom?

2456710

Comments

  • ad9898_3
    ad9898_3 Posts: 3,858 Forumite
    carolt wrote: »
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01369/2103_Real_cost_1369124a.pdf

    Excellent table here, published 19 March 2009 in the Telegraph, that shows exactly what is going down in price - and what isn't.

    It's interesting that - with the exception of petrol costs, which will affect most people - provided they drive - virtually every other essential has actually gone up - in the case of a lot of essentials, by a huge perecentage.

    The only thing that's gone down - by a lot - is the cost of mortgages.

    So it seems that all this kerfuffle about deflation applies primarily to homeowners (yes, rents are falling, but not by the kind of percentages as mortgages).

    So homeowners who MEWED to buy a gas-guzzling 4X4, according to stereotype, and who coincidentally, pay for several internet connections and eat lots of eggs, will have lower costs.

    But for the rest of us - those who didn't have huge/any mortgage costs to start with and drive economical cars - prices are still going UP.

    So can someone explain again why we've reduced interest rates to the lowest for hundreds of years, why savers are being shat on, why we're throwing billions of pounds of our (and our children's) taxes at 'fixing' the problem, when it doesn't appear there's much of a problem to fix?

    Wouldn't it be cheaper to just help out a few people who over-borrowed on their mortgages, rather than sacrificing everyone?

    It seems to me that lowering interest rates is now creating exactly the deflationary spiral it was supposed to prevent, as today's headlines about pay freezes/pay cuts to come for millions, due to the fact that pay is based on RPI (including mortgages) not CPI, demonstrate.

    Obviously, once these pay cuts start to bite, then the problems will really start - not only are prices still rising, but people will have less to pay them with.

    It doesn't make any sense.

    Great post Carol, I would like this statement above to be put to Crash, it would be good to watch him riggle out of it, with his hand gestures trying convince people that what is coming out of his mouth wasn't utter s**t.:rolleyes:
  • ad9898_3
    ad9898_3 Posts: 3,858 Forumite
    kennyboy66 wrote: »
    It was CPI not RPI that was supposed to have been targeted by the BoE for setting interest rates.


    But...but... that doesn't suit now:rolleyes:, i.e. it won't help bail out the over indebted.
  • kennyboy66_2
    kennyboy66_2 Posts: 2,598 Forumite
    ad9898 wrote: »
    I said it yesterday, deflation is a myth at this time, mortgage IR's have been cut by the BoE and Clown has cut VAT, lo and behold we have 'manufactured deflation' so the government then gives the green light to the BoE ot 'print'.

    Essentials, such as food, council tax, etc.. are all going up. Yet pay freezes and pay cuts are on the agenda. Put it this way, I pretty much gaurantee most of us will feel a lot poorer at the end of the year than we do now. The government are also now using RPI, which was never used when it didn't represent low IR's, CPI is still over the government target of 2%, and I think it will stay there TBH

    You may be right in your 2nd paragragh, however people can't have it both ways, rejoicing that house prices are falling and then claiming deflation is a myth.

    The reason RPI is given prominence is that it is (and has always been) the index that state benefits / pay awards have been linked to.
    US housing: it's not a bubble

    Moneyweek, December 2005
  • Wookster
    Wookster Posts: 3,795 Forumite
    ad9898 wrote: »
    I said it yesterday, deflation is a myth at this time, mortgage IR's have been cut by the BoE and Clown has cut VAT, lo and behold we have 'manufactured deflation' so the government then gives the green light to the BoE ot 'print'.

    Essentials, such as food, council tax, etc.. are all going up. Yet pay freezes and pay cuts are on the agenda. Put it this way, I pretty much gaurantee most of us will feel a lot poorer at the end of the year than we do now. The government are also now using RPI, which was never used when it didn't represent low IR's, CPI is still over the government target of 2%, and I think it will stay there TBH

    Exactly. Deflation is being trumpeted so that frantic (and desperate) measures can be undertaken to re-inflate the house market.

    It is madness. Absolute madness.
  • ad9898_3
    ad9898_3 Posts: 3,858 Forumite
    poppy10 wrote: »
    Full report here:
    http://www.statistics.gov.uk/pdfdir/cpi0309.pdf

    CPI up from 3% to 3.2% (forecast was for 2.6%)
    RPI down from 0.1% to 0% (forecast was for -0.8%)
    RPIX up from 2.4% to 2.5%

    No deflation here. Dear oh dear.

    The government are now screwed (and so are we:mad:), their 'little plan' to create deflation, so they can reduce interest rates to zero and print money, doesn't seem to be working.
  • poppy10_2
    poppy10_2 Posts: 6,588 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    ad9898 wrote: »
    their 'little plan' to create deflation, so they can reduce interest rates to zero and print money, doesn't seem to be working.
    They already reduced interest rates essentially to zero and started printing money. They thought deflation would ensue. Any economics A-level student could tell you the opposite would happen.
    poppy10
  • kennyboy66 wrote: »
    It was CPI not RPI that was supposed to have been targeted by the BoE for setting interest rates.

    Yes and CPI doesn't look remotely negative to me, infact it ROSE to 3.2%! CPI rising and above 2%, so why are interest rates at 0.5% (oh yes deflation I forgot).

    The BoE know the media will talk about deflation even when it's RPI deflation (CPI still being above >2% isn't as good a headline as DEFLATION) and won't question falling interest rates
    "One thing that is different, and has changed here, is the self-absorption, not just greed. Everybody is in a hurry now and there is a 'the rules don't apply to me' sort of thing." - Bill Bryson
  • carolt
    carolt Posts: 8,531 Forumite
    kennyboy66 wrote: »
    It was CPI not RPI that was supposed to have been targeted by the BoE for setting interest rates.

    Quite.

    Well said.

    'Supposed to' - but clearly it isn't.
    When house prices were going through the roof, the government were happy to sit oin their hands and say - but look - it's OK because cheap Chinese tat means that we have no inflation problem. So we can ignore RPI. Now that house prices are falling, magically RPI matters, and the fact that real inflation that affects most people (ie not just a few who took on too much debt to buy over-priced houses) is going UP!!!! (thanks poppy10, for the figures - UP to 3.2%), is conveniently swept under the carpet. :mad:

    Deflation my !!!!.
  • poppy10_2
    poppy10_2 Posts: 6,588 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Oil price are half what they were this time last year. So why are household fuel prices (gas and 'leccy) up 22.3% year on year?

    They were quick to put the prices up when oil was rising, but since the collapse in oil prices we haven't seen the promised fuel price drops.
    poppy10
  • carolt
    carolt Posts: 8,531 Forumite
    kennyboy66 wrote: »
    The point that the Telegraphs "real cost of living" has fallen by 4.3% obviously seems to have escaped you.

    No - it hasn't escaped me. My point - that the supposed 'deflation' only applied to those with big mortgages on tracker rates, and/or very heavy petrol users, appears to have escaped you, however.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.