We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Fantasy Economics: digging us out of a £43bn black hole

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/article5947172.ece
It’s one of the trickiest tasks in politics: cutting government spending without committing electoral suicide. Whoever wins the next election will need to find another £43 billion a year to start balancing the books. So, how could they do it?
The most simple option for those playing our fantasy game of “Cut The Budget” would be to protect all public spending and raise taxes. Slapping 9p on the basic rate of income tax would raise the cash — as well as being the quickest possible route out of office.
A brutal retrenchment in the form of tax rises and spending cuts will be inescapable if the nation’s finances are to be put back into a credible and sustainable state during this binge. Disagreeable fantasy will become unpleasant reality faster than many realise.
This is going to hurt for taxpayers and the public sector alike.....

Comments

  • amcluesent
    amcluesent Posts: 9,425 Forumite
    Having worked in the public-sector IT, the amount of time and money wasted is astonishing. The staff don't do a great deal, they 'let' work-packages with consultants following a nonsensical 'procurement process' whose 'outcomes' are then 'quality reviewed' by the permies.

    Basically Joe Taxpayer is being stiffed for the public-sector salaries and pensions, then paying for the consultants who know they can run rings around the permies and don't give a damn except for profiteering.

    No wonder, long after the event, the NAO come in to reflect on more ££ millions wasted on IT.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.