We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Old Scheme - Maintenance Requirement & Protected Income

Hi, probably one for the old scheme experts ..

Scenario - one NRP with children by one PWC, no additional children

Does anyone know if the CSA still calculate the protected income calculations if the NRP has to pay more than the basic maintenance requirement? ie the additional element as well

My gut feel is that in such a scenario it would be impossible for the protected income calculations to override the original calculations but I just can't wrap my head around why!


Have I got this right?
SEPT 2008 - The CSA is responsible for collecting money in 553,800 out of 1,247,100 cases. In 442,000 of these cases the Resident Parent is on Benefits and so apart from £10 each, the money paid by each Non-Resident Parent goes to the Government and not the Resident Parent. The CSA collected £68.6m. Is the Govt. erasing child proverty? You decide!

Comments

  • kelloggs36
    kelloggs36 Posts: 7,712 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Can you give more details? They do still calculate additional elements where the assessable income meets and exceeds the maintenance requirement - there is a capped amount though. This is compared to the protected income and also if it were to exceed 30% of net income then assessment would be capped at 30% of net income.
  • Thanks Kelloggs. I don't know all the detail figures as yet.

    However, I am told that the person is paying the additional element and so they were wondering if the protected income would kick in. My gut feel is that if there are no other children then the protected income calcs would be irrelevant - as their assessable income is so high (proven by the fact that they have to pay the additional element).
    SEPT 2008 - The CSA is responsible for collecting money in 553,800 out of 1,247,100 cases. In 442,000 of these cases the Resident Parent is on Benefits and so apart from £10 each, the money paid by each Non-Resident Parent goes to the Government and not the Resident Parent. The CSA collected £68.6m. Is the Govt. erasing child proverty? You decide!
  • kelloggs36
    kelloggs36 Posts: 7,712 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    If their protected income level leaves them with the same or more than the calculated amount, then this is what they will pay (unless full assessment including the additional element is more than 30% of net income, in which case it would be the 30% figure). If their protected income level is breached if they were to pay the full assessed amount, then the actual amount payable would the amount which would leave them with the protected income level.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.