We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

What are reasonable house prices?

13468911

Comments

  • white_noise
    white_noise Posts: 116 Forumite
    mitchaa wrote: »
    Food, bills and normal living expenses would surely see to the above home being repossessed.

    unless that person had savings to dip into to make up the payments for a short while
    WN
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    mitchaa wrote: »
    I can't see how anyone would be able to afford a 15% mortgage rate and a 3.5x multiple without help from a 2nd income source.

    £25000 income after tax is £1588, An £87500 mortgage at 15% is £1120

    Just over 70% of take home.

    Food, bills and normal living expenses would surely see to the above home being repossessed.

    that's one reason why any current ot future governments will have to keep interest rates at affordable levels to protect those on SVR's and trackers - that's 60% of people on mortgages
  • white_noise
    white_noise Posts: 116 Forumite
    chucky wrote: »
    don't forget that dependent on age your salary in year 10 (and if you go out further even more) of your mortgage will be higher than year 1 of your mortgage and will not be 3.5 times your initial income.

    many people forget this.

    Why is this?
    WN
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    As on old !!!!!! reading this post I have come to realise that there is not much point in comparing historic house prices with today’s as society has change so much. Back in the seventies a lot less people went to university if fact from my secondary school in a very affluent area only 1 person did. People got married a lot younger and lived with their parents until they did. I was married by the time I was 22 and most of my friends were married around that time. We manage to save a 10% deposit + legal fees in the 18 months before we got married and moved into an almost empty house no Tele etc. I can’t see peopledoing that now
  • ninky_2
    ninky_2 Posts: 5,872 Forumite
    Actually the average (only figure I could find was mean so distorted by high earners) HOUSEHOLD income in London is £766 a week = £39 832 a year. You can't just double incomes because there are two earners as this doesn't take into account the single people or gender differences in incomes.
    Those who will not reason, are bigots, those who cannot, are fools, and those who dare not, are slaves. - Lord Byron
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    mitchaa wrote: »
    I can't see how anyone would be able to afford a 15% mortgage rate and a 3.5x multiple without help from a 2nd income source.

    £25000 income after tax is £1588, An £87500 mortgage at 15% is £1120

    Just over 70% of take home.

    Food, bills and normal living expenses would surely see to the above home being repossessed.

    A bit of poetic licence you wouldnt have got a Mortgage of 3.5 joint income in the seventie s/ early eighties
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ninky wrote: »
    Actually the average (only figure I could find was mean so distorted by high earners) HOUSEHOLD income in London is £766 a week = £39 832 a year. You can't just double incomes because there are two earners as this doesn't take into account the single people or gender differences in incomes.

    this spreadsheet below does

    http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_labour/ASHE_2008/tab7_7a.xls

    http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.html?p=19587237&postcount=22
  • lukekelly_2
    lukekelly_2 Posts: 160 Forumite
    House prices are reasonable if people are prepared to pay them. They are unreasonable if they are not. If you don't like them then rent.

    It is not house prices that are unreasonable here, they are set by supply and demand. We are the unreasonable part. Irrational ebullience or fear leads us to be prepared to pay strange strange prices.
    You can't just double incomes because there are two earners as this doesn't take into account the single people or gender differences in incomes.
    Looking at couples removes those gender related issues that may or may not exist in the income averages.
  • mitchaa
    mitchaa Posts: 4,487 Forumite
    tara747 wrote: »
    Errrr.... since when was it normal to borrow 3.5x JOINT salary???? That's my point. 3.5x joint (or 7x single!) mortgages are insane.

    Thank goodness for this HPC, when it has bottomed out people will no longer have to borrow 3.5x joint salary to buy an average house and might actually be able to afford to have a life as well as a mortgage! :beer:

    I think you've had your head stuck in the sand the last 10 yrs and even now if i am being honest.

    Every lender out there offers more than 3.5x joint, C&G branch are currently offering 5x joint

    So i see 3.5x as perfectly normal, and easily affordable.

    Just to illustrate....

    Male on £30k (£1875)
    Female on £20k (£1300)

    3.5x = £175k mortgage

    Earnings are £3175, mortgage at 5% = £1023.

    I see £1023 out of £3175 as very affordable if you are asking me as it equates to less than a 1/3 of the take home. (32%)

    Even if the female was to drop down to PT in order to raise children, the income would still be £2600pm (39%) or with the child related benefits that they would expect £2800pm (36.5%)

    There is no argument that 3.5x joint is not affordable as, as above it clearly is.
  • I'd say the average house price should be about 5 times the median full-time wage:
    if0o44.jpg

    According to the derivatives markets the property market is (as usual) on course to overshoot that:
    http://www.sprefs.com/index.php?page_id=169

    Of course, if interest rates were to remain low for medium to long term then the correct income multiple would rightly change. How likely is it that interest rates remain low throughout the next decade? Pretty slim, I'd say.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.