We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Credit Agreement-is it worthless
I completed on additional borrowing with my mortgage provider. Having applied for interest only terms, but then received and signed the credit agreement act of 1974 which stated repayment terms, 
although at the interest only monthly repayment figure. Can the lender then claim they made a mistake and change my loan to rectify their mistake or are they bound by the credit agreement. Obviously I would be quite happy if they stuck to the original agreement and they are trying hard to get me to settle with them. Any one know the law? can I insist they honour the original agreement?
although at the interest only monthly repayment figure. Can the lender then claim they made a mistake and change my loan to rectify their mistake or are they bound by the credit agreement. Obviously I would be quite happy if they stuck to the original agreement and they are trying hard to get me to settle with them. Any one know the law? can I insist they honour the original agreement? 0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 247K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards