We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Pre 1988 loser!

Hi everybody.
I am new to this website and to save me trawling through 3 years of discussion, if I summarise briefly my situation could somebody please let me know if anything has changed from the way I understood my dilemma 3 years sgo?

I took out an endowment in October 1987 sold to me by an IFA. This promised to pay £43,000 plus a lump sum in 25 years time. A few years ago I started receiving warning letters from Royal & Sun Alliance (now Phoenix) that the policy may pay out as little as £25,000 or less. I made vigorous enquiries at that time on what rights I had regarding mis-selling and Ombudsman, FSCS etc.I discovered to my horror that I had no rights as it was taken out pre-legislation.

My questions are : has anything changed with regard to pre-1988 rights and is it possible I may not even get back what I paid in (£20,500) when the policy matures in 2012?

Thanks for any assistance you can give !

Comments

  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    Is the IFA still around?
  • He is still around but working for another company rather than for himself. The company just totally dismissed me when I made protestations to them !
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    Did he put in writing that there was a guaranteed amount as stated?
  • No, the word guaranteed was never mentioned or written. I was 'sold' by the amounts stated in his quotation, which had certain economic assumptions, that it would repay the £43k mortgage and return a surplus of £20k !! If I'm lucky I might get one third of that ! It's criminal !
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    Doubt if you have a leg to stand on. You were never told you would even get your money back. Stock market investments always did carry a level of risk. Sad but true.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,408 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Its pre-regulation so it complied with the rules that were in place at the time. i.e. none. That isnt going to change.
    I was 'sold' by the amounts stated in his quotation, which had certain economic assumptions, that it would repay the £43k mortgage and return a surplus of £20k !! If I'm lucky I might get one third of that ! It's criminal !

    You mean you were sold by the potential using rates of returns that had actually occurred in the recent past (at time of sale). Problem was those rates did not occur again in the future mainly as inflation was lower. On the upside, the changes in the economy did make you better off than had the old economy continued and the endowment hit surplus. Although the current recession could put a spanner in the works there too!
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.