We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
SIPP, Hargreaves Lansdown and Funds
Options
Comments
-
Si1, right, the first thing you do is completely ignore any fund or fund manager (as distinct form management company) that has a record of not achieving at least average performance. That eliminates all of the trackers and other funds with a record of poor performance.
Then you apply the zero sum rule that those who favour efficient markets use: if those are consistently doing badly, the money they aren't making has to be going to the rest.
Your challenge then is to find the managers whose style matches anticipated market conditions and who may actually deliver. You still might not succeed but you at least have the advantage of selecting from those that aren't sure to do badly.
For the UK markets there was a study a few years ago that found that simply selecting the best managers from the previous period couldn't produce outperformance only because of the initial commission that was charged on fund switches. Since times have moved on and nobody needs to pay initial commission these days that study now shows that you can get outperformance.
broadly agree - except it's already reasonably well established that trackers DO outperform the average if only based on their low charging structure
but I would agree that if applied succesfully then the above argument gives you the best chance of getting an outperforming active fund
I'm going to sign off now - am truly grateful for this enlighteniong dicsussion - all the best0 -
I'll give you a thanks for that
Actually, I do have a tracker fund as part of my pension, purely on the low charge basis. It does quite well and means I keep at least one finger on the pulse at any one time.
You've never seen me, but I've been here all along - watching and learning...:cool:0 -
I am considering transferring two personal pension plans into a SIPP. One has no exit fee the other a nominal amount.
The combined cash total is about £140k. I'm 41 and don't plan on making any further contributions for the foreseeable future.
If an annuity won't be taken for at least 25 years would it still be prudent to buy into funds in stages ?
Over what kind of time frame should I be drip feeding the transferred cash into selected funds to benefit from pound cost averaging ?0 -
If an annuity won't be taken for at least 25 years would it still be prudent to buy into funds in stages ?
No.
Are you sure you fully understand what you are doing ?'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'0 -
Like most people, pension planning is something I would like to get right, hence asking for advice in this forum.0
-
What is the reasoning behind moving Funds from two Personal Pensions into a Self Invested Personal Pension ?'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'0
-
If I said that one of the funds was an original Guardian Royal Exchange Choices Managed pension would that go some way to answering your question !0
-
If I said that one of the funds was an original Guardian Royal Exchange Choices Managed pension would that go some way to answering your question !
no. What are your reasons for moving into the most expensive option for funds?I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
no. What are your reasons for moving into the most expensive option for funds?
From 14 years of monthly contributions to the Choices fund from 1995 contributions £57k.
From 14 years of monthly contributions to the Choices fund from 1995 voluntary fund value £58k.
Effect of inflation would obviously wipe out this £1k "gain".
Charges AMC 1%, monthly additional charge £2.94 and a bid offer spread of 5%.
Would I not be better off in an All share tracker with a Total Expense Ratio of 0.27% if the pot has another 25 years to grow ?0 -
Would I not be better off in an All share tracker with a Total Expense Ratio of 0.27% if the pot has another 25 years to grow ?
Dont know. You havent told us how you are currently invested and what other options exist and what the costs of transfer will be?
One thing that is obvious though, putting 100% into any one single focused fund is bad investing. 100% into a FTSE all share tracker is not a good idea. It doesnt matter if its cheap. You are putting all your eggs in one basket and the UK stockmarket is not known for its diversification and investment returns.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards