We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Disaster for Britain as housing becomes more affordable
Comments
-
With regard to house prices, there is no complexity. It is simply a ponzi scheme. You'll be able to read much more at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme
Do you not see any resemblence between the housing market bubble and a ponzi scheme?
The same could be said of any market, comodities etc.
The idea of a piramid sale is very simlar to every business.0 -
longtimelurker wrote: »Care to back this up?
And remember, around 60% of people are mortgage holders not property owners.
Funny I seem to have the deeds and I am down as a "home owner"
I am Liable for the loan secured or my house but by law I am a owner of the land just that the loan to buy it is secured against it.0 -
stephen163 wrote: »Increasing house prices make people feel secure and more ready to splash their cash. This is surely a good thing for economic growth, and the economy as a whole. What good is wealth to an economy if it is tied up in a theoretical house price valuation? At the very least, people who MEWed and spent were doing a service for the economy. Everyone benefits from consumer spending.
I.
I understand what you are saying. And I agree up to a point. Take my word for it - I'm hardly against shopping! I'm proud to say that I've done MORE than my fair share to support the economy:p
But there is a WORLD of difference between supporting the economy via spending money one actually has...vs. one we [EMAIL="DON'T@T."]DON'T[/EMAIL]. It's not people spending their money which caused the current broohaha, is it? It's people spending without having it.
I still fail to understand how getting neck-deep into dept would benefit either the individual or the economy apart from creating a temporary and fallacious "feel" of wealth.. How can accruing dept ad infinitum be beneficial for a society? Puzzling.0 -
With regard to house prices, there is no complexity. It is simply a ponzi scheme. You'll be able to read much more at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme
Do you not see any resemblence between the housing market bubble and a ponzi scheme?
Is this also where the insult "You pontz" comes from?
ie Wookster you really are a pontz.0 -
With regard to house prices, there is no complexity. It is simply a ponzi scheme. You'll be able to read much more at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme
Do you not see any resemblence between the housing market bubble and a ponzi scheme?
If it is a Ponzi scheme you better get in quick, you don't want to be the last one in
'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
I think a lot of people, especially those who have not studied economics in any great detail, fall for the fixed pie fallacy. Wealth can be created, it is not a fixed pie. You can make the pie bigger. Call me a stupid optimist, but we have witnessed in the last 100 years in the developed world one of the most prolonged and sustained increase in wealth in world history. Nobody can deny this - if you do, prove to me that the average Briton today is less well of than one in 1900. This has happened because of trade, transactions, investment. Releasing equity from home ownership increases economic wealth overall, even if the new debt incurred by the homeowner is equal to the monetary value transferred to the rest of the economy. It is not a zero sum game, and money is very different to wealth. These are the crucial points you need to have due cognisance of.0
-
stephen163 wrote: »I think a lot of people, especially those who have not studied economics in any great detail, fall for the fixed pie fallacy. Wealth can be created, it is not a fixed pie. ....It is not a zero sum game, and money is very different to wealth. These are the crucial points you need to have due cognisance of.
I think all these are fair points. But since they pertain to convoluted abstract concepts.... I'll sensibly shut up.
Thanks for trying to explain it, though.0 -
mr.broderick wrote: »Is this also where the insult "You pontz" comes from?
ie Wookster you really are a pontz.
Congratulations. Another addition to the ignore list. MSE becomes a happier place by the day.0 -
mr.broderick wrote: »I sell cars graham, what do you do?
Is it busy? Seems not? Optimistic?0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »Is it busy? Seems not?
It's not about being busy it is about nailing the next graham that walks in with gap,ppp,superguard,10%flat. One walks in every day.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards