We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Fewer properties changing hands than in the last 50 years.
skap7309
Posts: 874 Forumite
Talk about a stand off.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/4800418/Property-freeze-is-worst-since-1950s.html
Record low since 1959. Given the much higher level of homes and population now that is some statistic.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/4800418/Property-freeze-is-worst-since-1950s.html
Record low since 1959. Given the much higher level of homes and population now that is some statistic.
0
Comments
-
Talk about a stand off.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/4800418/Property-freeze-is-worst-since-1950s.html
Record low since 1959. Given the much higher level of homes and population now that is some statistic.
So that would be 50 years then
:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
Talk about a stand off.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/4800418/Property-freeze-is-worst-since-1950s.html
Record low since 1959. Given the much higher level of homes and population now that is some statistic.
I'm getting the feeling that this time it's going to drag out much longer, I think many people just don't have the equity in their houses that they should have because of mewing, and therefore can't reduce, they will end up staying put, or if they are in difficulty, then repossessed.
I've said before, I have a friend or bought a house in '88 for 24k he is still there and owes 89k now. I know that's probably an extreme example, but mewing has been rife in the last decade, it's even, perversely been adding to economic growth, thats going to take a long time to unwind.0 -
Death, Divorce and Debt can't be held off indefinitely, that will trigger sales (maybe distress sales at auction...)0
-
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »So that would be 50 years then

lol my bad, had not been awake very long!0 -
amcluesent wrote: »Death, Divorce and Debt can't be held off indefinitely, that will trigger sales (maybe distress sales at auction...)
Distressed are selling from what I hear. (well repos anyway) some EA's are selling houses at 50% below peak.
Belive it or not a lot of repos are not going to auction because they are being purhased before through EA's (Auctions are a last expensive resort for lenders).
From what I here Repo prices are at the bottom now as their is competition for buying houses with 50% off.0 -
lol my bad, had not been awake very long!
LOL its not a problem.
I wonder if the figure will get even lower.
With mortgage approvals up 4% to 23,000 in January, we could see a lower figure in months to come.
This is the sad thing. Even with property on average dropping 16-20% from peak peopme buying homes have dropped.
Arguably, they are already more affordable than peak, so affordability is not the reason. It must be down to cautiousness from potential buyers and cautiousness from banks tightening their lending criteria.
There is an argument to say that it is harder to get a property now than when houses were at their peak.:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »There is an argument to say that it is harder to get a property now than when houses were at their peak.
Exactly that - many sellers are holding out hoping to see a quick recovery and buyers simply do not have access to the crazy lending of mortgages of 18 months ago.0 -
Exactly that - many sellers are holding out hoping to see a quick recovery and buyers simply do not have access to the crazy lending of mortgages of 18 months ago.
Well, most potential sellers do not have to sell although there will be some.
If they do not have to sell, then they may believe that they will wait until the market turns.
When that market turns is so subjective that no-one really knows
There are reports that FTB's have started to return to the market.
We have seen the fastest drop in recorded times and there is nothing to say that the stabalisation and recovery would also be expedited.
Naturally someone who bought many years ago can afford to drop prices more, but those that bought in the last 2-3 years may not have that option.
It could be a simple choice of: -
1) Sell at a loss and move on
2) Decide not to sell and stay put until the market recovers
It would seem there are a lot of option 2's about:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards