We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Mackenzie hall/Lowell Portfolio 1 ltd

Hi guys I posted around a month ago that Mackenzie Hall had sent a letter asking me to contact them but no further details.

Today I got a second letter from Mackenzie Hall stating the client is Lowell Portfolio 1 Ltd and the outstanding amount is £634.89. They have offered me a Time Barred offer of settling the balance with a payment of £317.45 or setting up a payment plan of £25 per month for the full amount.

I have no idea what this is for and I don't thing it is on my credit file. From looking through the internet Lowell tend to be for credit cards which I have nver had and also 3 mobile which i may owe to from a long long time ago.

Advise on my next move guys.
«1

Comments

  • bump, please help guys
  • dollydo
    dollydo Posts: 135 Forumite
    Hi,
    Hopefully someone will be along soon who knows more than me ! But I think that if the debt is over 6 years old (england) and 5 years old (scotland) then it is statued barred and not repayable.
  • Yes I believe that is the case, I'm sure somebody had a template letter that can be sent asking for further info on the debt but not sure if thats what I should do or if I should just pay the reduce amount whilst that offer is on the table.
  • LilacPixie
    LilacPixie Posts: 8,052 Forumite
    I, personally would send the 'prove it' letter.
    MF aim 10th December 2020 :j:eek:
    MFW 2012 no86 OP 0/2000 :D
  • Even though the reduced offer would no longer be on the table?
  • dollydo
    dollydo Posts: 135 Forumite
    Hi, have found both prove it and statue barred letters on thread - copied off of fermi ( hope you don't mind - fermi )

    National Debtline "prove it" letter

    Quote:
    1 High Street,
    Newtown,
    Kent
    R21 4RH
    October 9, 2007

    The Loan Company
    Company House,
    Church Street,
    Newtown,
    Kent,
    R1 7HG


    Dear Sir/Madam

    Ref: xxxxxxxxxxx

    You have contacted us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by ourselves.

    We would point out that we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to The Loan Company.

    We are familiar with the ‘Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance’ which states that it is unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

    We would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

    Furthermore, ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

    We would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above accounts unless you can provide evidence as to our liability for the debt in question.

    We await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise we will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

    We look forward to your reply.

    Yours faithfully





    Mrs A N Other


    and the statue barred letters.

    England/Wales.


    Quote:
    1 High Street,
    Newtown,
    Kent
    R21 4RH
    Date

    The Loan Company
    Company House,
    Church Street,
    Newtown,
    Kent,
    R1 7HG

    I do not acknowledge any debt to you or any other company or organisation that you claim to be representing.

    Dear Sir/Madam

    Account No:

    You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

    I/we would point out that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5 "an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued".

    I/we would also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred debt that "it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period".

    The last correspondence/payment/acknowledgement or payment of this debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from me/us in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, I/we suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against me/us to recover the alleged amount claimed.

    The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that "continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred could amount to harassment contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970".

    I/we await your written confirmation that no further contact will be made concerning the above account and confirmation that this matter is now closed.

    I/we look forward to your reply.

    Yours faithfully




    Mrs A N Other
    Hope this helps.
  • LilacPixie
    LilacPixie Posts: 8,052 Forumite
    Yup. You do not even know for sure what this debt relates too. Not to mention DCA's are weasels, they would not be giving 'reduced offers' if they thought they could get the whole amount.

    Does this work
    MF aim 10th December 2020 :j:eek:
    MFW 2012 no86 OP 0/2000 :D
  • sutton111
    sutton111 Posts: 6,302 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    martin82 wrote: »
    Yes I believe that is the case, I'm sure somebody had a template letter that can be sent asking for further info on the debt but not sure if thats what I should do or if I should just pay the reduce amount whilst that offer is on the table.

    It's up to a DCA to prove you owe the money not the other way around. As the above post said send them the prove it letter and see what they send back, I sent MH a Statute Barred letter about 3 weeks ago and I haven't heard a thing, I know that the debt they were chasing me for is actually Statute Barred though.

    If you require more debt help contact the National Debt Line, they are they helpful.
  • Livto_2
    Livto_2 Posts: 70 Forumite
    Lowell Portfolio are a DCA themselves.
    So why the have passed it on to Muck Hall is anyone's guess?
    If Lowells cannot collect the debt, then rest assured that Muck Hall certainly will not.
    They are each as useless & as powerless as each other :rolleyes:
  • phil80
    phil80 Posts: 153 Forumite
    Do not pay them a penny till they can prove that you owe them the money if you are unsure it is your debt in the first place why even consider paying them anything. Write using the above letters and see what they come back with.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.