We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Permanent ban on 100% mortgages (merged)
bluejake
Posts: 268 Forumite
Labour plan permanent ban on 100% mortgages
Sensible idea, maybe they should also permanently ban gifted 'deposits' since we all pick up the tab when irresponsible behavior in the housing market goes pear shaped. And often the guilty parties walk away from the mess with pockets full of cash.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1151886/Labour-plan-permanent-ban-100-mortgages.html
Sensible idea, maybe they should also permanently ban gifted 'deposits' since we all pick up the tab when irresponsible behavior in the housing market goes pear shaped. And often the guilty parties walk away from the mess with pockets full of cash.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1151886/Labour-plan-permanent-ban-100-mortgages.html
0
Comments
-
I wonder if the same people who criticized Labour for not interfering enough during the past decade will complain about this too.“I could see that, if not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled.” - P.G. Wodehouse0
-
even though I hate labour I have to say this is actually a good idea
forces people to save for a future.If you find yourself in a fair fight, then you have failed to plan properly
I've only ever been wrong once! and that was when I thought I was wrong but I was right0 -
So 99.99% mortgages are still ok..?0
-
It seems like a sensible idea. However, it is closing the door after the horse has bolted!In case you hadn't already worked it out - the entire global financial system is predicated on the assumption that you're an idiot:cool:0
-
Dooooooooooooooonut wrote: »What you need to understand, and probably will when you stop being a leech on society
Being a student is hardly being a leech on society? Or perhaps you are Pol Pot?In case you hadn't already worked it out - the entire global financial system is predicated on the assumption that you're an idiot:cool:0 -
Good old Gordo - we're safe in his hands.0
-
-
lostinrates wrote: »I've found lots of reason to critise but I'm thrilled for our society about this one.

I've heard whispers about mortgage caps (on LTV and multiples), this would be excellent news, but as lostinrates says, a ban on this type of thing would be a good start. A mandatory 10% deposit would be very beneficial on learning people the value of money and saving before they get into the housing market, this has to be a good thing. Banning IO mortgages unless you have a proven investment vehicle (not HPI either:rolleyes:) would be another policy worth considering. All these things would help prevent another housing boom, which inevitably ends in a bust.0 -
I think it's a stupid idea. I bought my house using 100% mortgage in 1997, I have never defaulted on any payments, nor do I have any other debts. The cost of the mortgage repayments was less than it would have been if I was renting in the same area.
As long as credit checks are done and the applicant is not in danger of overstretching themselves, I don't see why they shouldn't be lent 100%.0 -
Typical Clown/socialist interference with the market for an easy headline about yet another 'initiative'; just wait to see what blow-back there is from the law of unintended consequences.
Why don't they do something useful like abolish their hopeless HIPs. Oh wait, that brings in VAT and keeps council droobs in "work"!
If, by some chance, they really wanted to help the market then reform the nonsensical buying process.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards