me my husband and his ex wife? help?

Lensman_2

Because the display of threads lists by newest post/reply, you can get one to the top of the list by replying to it.

This is a problem sometimes because old, dusty threads can get put back to the top of the list. Where less careful posters might think it is current, post a reply and it self perpetuates. Most forums don't like bumping.

Your second post was a bump - with good manners

Mine was mostly to wish you the best, so it wasn't a pure bump - but it worked the same way.

On this forum we tend to keep one good thread current by consistently bumping it. It is this one:
http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?t=990869&page=25
It has dropped down to the third page of threads now, so it will get a bump soon. Why don't you do the honours? Just a few words to say nicely that you are giving it a bump.

Of course, bumped threads can get a little long....

lornio

has anyone been in this mess before? x

JCS1

Info on divorce/property transfers and bankruptcy; looks like there is a precedent gone to the appeal courts which may help you

http://www.wragge.com/published_articles_2521.asp

lornio

have read the info but it still does not give any answers? just to say that the o.r. look into each case closely and it has to be seen as fare settlement!! does my hubby having two children with his ex make a difference? or is it up to her to argue her case? so confused xxx

lornio

bump bump?????

RAS

Try a pm for Richard_S or fermi.

philnicandamy

Or even Debt Doctor......

Lensman_2

lornio wrote: »

bump bump?????

.

I should have said that the first two pages will be read by nearly everybody, so no need to bump till it gets lower than that.

Someone here will have an answer for you beyond JCS1's good post.

The thought occurred to me that the debt charities would be worth a call though. It is definately worth giving them a ring in the morning. Contact details are in philnicandamy's post earlier in the thread.

lornio

bumpin my head on a brick wall :EasterBun

JCS1

I don't think there is a definitive answer that can reassue you.

My understanding was that Transfer Under Value (TUV) could not be overturned if it was made by court order following a divorce. The article I posted suggest that this was challenged, and went to the High Courts and the Appeal Courts.

The article suggest that each case is now judged on it's merit, so I suspect the OR will look at the value of the house at time of transfer, the equity in the house at the time, etc.

However. This article seems to indicate that TUV under court order cannot be overturned, but there does seem to be conflicting reports on-line

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/reports/article3036889.ece