We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Watchdog issues pensions warning

Watchdog issues pensions warning


_44677494_pensionsday2pa226.jpg The downturn is of real concern to employers, the regulator says


Employers must not use the downturn as an excuse to cut pension contributions while still paying dividends to shareholders, says a watchdog.
The UK Pensions Regulator said economic conditions were of "real concern" to employers with final salary schemes.
But it warned that while they could have some breathing space they must still treat trustees fairly.
The latest estimate of total company pension deficits is £191bn, much worse than deficits of £49bn a year ago.
'Real concern'
Earlier in February, the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) - the official pension scheme safety net - said 90% of the nearly 7,800 schemes it measured were in the red, with only 812 schemes - 10% - still in surplus.
o.gifstart_quote_rb.gifThe pension scheme recovery plan should not suffer, for example, in order to enable companies to continue paying dividends to shareholders end_quote_rb.gif


David Norgrove, Pensions Regulator chairman

inline_dashed_line.gif

Pension fund deficits fall back


A separate survey suggested that 25% of major private sector firms expected to close their final salary pension schemes to existing members in the next few years.
The Regulator's statement recognised the difficulties for many of these employers, but stressed struggling pension schemes should not bring companies down.
"There is no reason why a pension scheme deficit should push an otherwise viable employer into insolvency," said David Norgrove, chairman of the Pensions Regulator.
The statement said that when a company was under pressure there was potential to renegotiate previously agreed plans to repair pension deficits.
These "recovery plans" often mean that over a period of about 10 years, employers make additional contributions to ensure the pension scheme can pay the benefits it promised. Any plan that took more than ten years would face greater scrutiny from the watchdog.
Trustees should understand what was affordable for the employer, the regulator said.
But it stressed that trustees of a scheme in deficit were like unsecured creditors, and so they should be treated fairly.
"The pension scheme recovery plan should not suffer, for example, in order to enable companies to continue paying dividends to shareholders," said Mr Norgrove.
Fresh warning
The guidance has been welcomed by some in the industry.
"It is a healthy dose of realism saying that companies can't pay what they have not got. It is not a green light to stop funding schemes but it gives employers some breathing room," said David Saunders, partner at pensions law firm Sackers.
"Pension schemes payments can't be curtailed to pay other creditors or big bonuses. We can expect to see employers back end load recovery plans for their pension schemes."
The Regulator's statement to employers with final salary pension schemes is the second of its kind in recent months.
In October, it issued a general warning to trustees about financial dangers to their schemes' investments. This was the first such statement since the regulator was established in 2005.
But in the autumn, the regulator said there was little evidence of any schemes losing money by directly investing in "toxic assets".
It stressed again that any employer that felt a recovery plan for an underfunded pension scheme would put the future health of the entire company at risk should discuss the scheme with trustees and the regulator. High profile company failures, such as Woolworth, have put more pressure on the safety net for pension schemes. The likelihood of a rise in insolvencies as the recession continues will add more schemes to those being taken on by the PPF.



http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7896734.stm
:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.